Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives

被引:393
|
作者
Benedetto, Umberto [1 ]
Head, Stuart J. [2 ]
Angelini, Gianni D. [1 ]
Blackstone, Eugene H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Heart Inst, Sch Clin Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg & Clin Invest, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
Statistics; Propensity score; Matching; Weighting; Stratification; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1093/ejcts/ezy167
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Propensity score (PS) methods offer certain advantages over more traditional regression methods to control for confounding by indication in observational studies. Although multivariable regression models adjust for confounders by modelling the relationship between covariates and outcome, the PS methods estimate the treatment effect by modelling the relationship between confounders and treatment assignment. Therefore, methods based on the PS are not limited by the number of events, and their use may be warranted when the number of confounders is large, or the number of outcomes is small. The PS is the probability for a subject to receive a treatment conditional on a set of baseline characteristics (confounders). The PS is commonly estimated using logistic regression, and it is used to match patients with similar distribution of confounders so that difference in outcomes gives unbiased estimate of treatment effect. This review summarizes basic concepts of the PS matching and provides guidance in implementing matching and other methods based on the PS, such as stratification, weighting and covariate adjustment.
引用
收藏
页码:1112 / 1117
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Propensity Score Matching A Statistical Method
    Kane, Liam T.
    Fang, Taolin
    Galetta, Matthew S.
    Goyal, Dhruv K. C.
    Nicholson, Kristen J.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (03): : 120 - 122
  • [2] Statistical Tools for Propensity Score Matching
    Duhamel, Alain
    Labreuche, Julien
    Gronnier, Caroline
    Mariette, Christophe
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (06) : E79 - E80
  • [3] A Primer on Propensity Score Analysis
    Shadish, William R.
    Steiner, Peter M.
    [J]. NEWBORN AND INFANT NURSING REVIEWS, 2010, 10 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [4] Propensity score matching
    Kurz, Christoph F.
    Krzywinski, Martin
    Altman, Naomi
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2024,
  • [5] Application and comparison of generalized propensity score matching versus pairwise propensity score matching
    Cui, Zhanglin L.
    Hess, Lisa M.
    Goodloe, Robert
    Faries, Doug
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (09) : 923 - 933
  • [6] AES Impact Evaluation With Integrated Farm Data: Combining Statistical Matching and Propensity Score Matching
    D'Alberto, Riccardo
    Zavalloni, Matteo
    Raggi, Meri
    Viaggi, Davide
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [7] Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score
    Abadie, Alberto
    Imbens, Guido W.
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2016, 84 (02) : 781 - 807
  • [8] Propensity score matching and randomization
    Mnatzaganian, George
    Davidson, David C.
    Hiller, Janet E.
    Ryan, Philip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (07) : 760 - 768
  • [9] On the inefficiency of propensity score matching
    Froelich, Markus
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 91 (03) : 279 - 290
  • [10] On the inefficiency of propensity score matching
    Markus Frölich
    [J]. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2007, 91 : 279 - 290