Portfolio optimization managing value at risk under heavy tail return, using stochastic maximum principle

被引:0
|
作者
Biswas, Subhojit [1 ]
Ghosh, Mrinal K. [2 ]
Mukherjee, Diganta [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Stat Inst, Stat Qual Control & Operat Res, Kolkata, India
[2] Indian Inst Sci, Dept Math, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[3] Indian Stat Inst, Sampling & Official Stat Unit, Kolkata, India
关键词
Dynamic programming; finance; portfolio optimization; Hamiltonian system; heavy tailed distribution; stochastic maximum principle;
D O I
10.1080/07362994.2020.1864405
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
We consider an investor whose portfolio consists of a single risky asset and a risk free asset. The risky asset's return has a heavy tailed distribution and thus does not have higher order moments. Hence, she aims to maximize the expected utility of the portfolio defined in terms of the median return. This is done subject to managing the Value at Risk (VaR) defined in terms of a high order quantile. Recalling that the median and other quantiles always exist and appealing to the asymptotic normality of their joint distribution, we use the stochastic maximum principle to formulate the dynamic optimization problem in its full generality. The issue of non-smoothness of the objective function is resolved by appropriate approximation technique. We also provide detailed empirical illustration using real life data. The equations which we obtain does not have any explicit analytical solution, so for numerical work we look for accurate approximations to estimate the value function and optimal strategy. As our calibration strategy is non-parametric in nature, no prior knowledge on the form of the distribution function is needed. Our results show close concordance with financial intuition. We expect that our results will add to the arsenal of the high frequency traders.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1049
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertain random portfolio optimization model with tail value-at-risk
    Qiqi Li
    Zhongfeng Qin
    Yingchen Yan
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2022, 26 : 9385 - 9394
  • [2] Uncertain random portfolio optimization model with tail value-at-risk
    Li, Qiqi
    Qin, Zhongfeng
    Yan, Yingchen
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (18) : 9385 - 9394
  • [3] A maximum principle for relaxed stochastic control of linear SDEs with application to bond portfolio optimization
    Daniel Andersson
    Boualem Djehiche
    [J]. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2010, 72 : 273 - 310
  • [4] A maximum principle for relaxed stochastic control of linear SDEs with application to bond portfolio optimization
    Andersson, Daniel
    Djehiche, Boualem
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 72 (02) : 273 - 310
  • [5] Research on portfolio optimization under asymmetric power-law distribution of return tail
    Feng, Qian-Ying
    Wu, Xu
    Zhang, Lin-Lin
    Li, Jia
    [J]. CHAOS, 2023, 33 (01)
  • [6] Portfolio optimization under the Value-at-Risk constraint
    Pirvu, Traian A.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2007, 7 (02) : 125 - 136
  • [7] An adaptive portfolio trading system: A risk-return portfolio optimization using recurrent reinforcement learning with expected maximum drawdown
    Almahdi, Saud
    Yang, Steve Y.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 87 : 267 - 279
  • [8] Dynamic portfolio optimization under value at risk constraint
    Wang, Xiuguo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF MODELLING AND SIMULATION, VOL IV: MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT, ECONOMIC AND FINANCE, 2008, : 336 - 341
  • [9] The Value at Risk measure of the financial portfolio with the heavy tail margins based on copula functions
    Lu, Jin
    Tian, Wenju
    Zhang, Pu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF MODELLING AND SIMULATION, VOL IV: MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT, ECONOMIC AND FINANCE, 2008, : 320 - 326
  • [10] Dynamic portfolio optimization: Time decomposition using the Maximum Principle with a scenario approach
    Barro, D
    Canestrelli, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 163 (01) : 217 - 229