Deterministic planning in the fifth international planning competition: PDDL3 and experimental evaluation of the planners

被引:158
|
作者
Gerevini, Alfonso E. [1 ]
Haslum, Patrik [2 ,3 ]
Long, Derek [4 ]
Saetti, Alessandro [1 ]
Dimopoulos, Yannis [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Dipartimento Elettron Automaz, Brescia, Italy
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] NICTA, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Cyprus, Dept Comp Sci, Nicosia, Cyprus
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Automated planning; Planning systems; PDDL; Planning languages; Knowledge representation in planning; Preferences in planning; Plan constraints; International planning competition; Benchmarks for planning; Experimental evaluation of planning; systems; CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION; PART;
D O I
10.1016/j.artint.2008.10.012
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The international planning competition (IPC) is an important driver for planning research. The general goals of the IPC include pushing the state of the art in planning technology by posing new scientific challenges, encouraging direct comparison of planning systems and techniques, developing and improving a common planning domain definition language, and designing new planning domains and problems for the research community. This paper focuses on the deterministic part of the fifth international planning competition (IPC5), presenting the language and benchmark domains that we developed for the competition, as well as a detailed experimental evaluation of the deterministic planners that entered IPC5, which helps to understand the state of the art in the field. We present an extension Of PDDL, called PDDL3. allowing the user to express strong and soft constraints about the structure of the desired plans, as well as strong and soft problem goals. We discuss the expressive power of the new language focusing on the restricted version that was used in IPC5, for which we give some basic results about its compilability into PDDL2. Moreover, we study the relative performance of the IPC5 planners in terms of solved problems, CPU time, and plan quality; we analyse their behaviour with respect to the winners of the previous competition; and we evaluate them in terms of their capability of dealing with soft goals and constraints, and of finding good quality plans in general, Overall, the results indicate significant progress in the field, but they also reveal that some important issues remain open and require further research, such as dealing with strong constraints and computing high quality plans in metric-time domains and domains involving soft goals or constraints. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 668
页数:50
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dealing with Numeric and Metric Time Constraints in PDDL3 via Compilation to Numeric Planning
    Bonassi, Luigi
    Gerevini, Alfonso Emilio
    Scala, Enrico
    [J]. THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 18, 2024, : 20036 - 20043
  • [2] The deterministic part of the seventh International Planning Competition
    Linares Lopez, Carlos
    Jimenez Celorrio, Sergio
    Garcia Olaya, Angel
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 223 : 82 - 119
  • [3] Performance robustness of AI planners in the 2014 International Planning Competition
    Bocchese, Andrea F.
    Fawcett, Chris
    Vallati, Mauro
    Gerevini, Alfonso E.
    Hoos, Holger H.
    [J]. AI COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 31 (06) : 445 - 463
  • [4] AIPS'00 Planning Competition - The Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling Systems
    Bacchus, F
    [J]. AI MAGAZINE, 2001, 22 (03) : 47 - 56
  • [5] The Fifth International Competition on Knowledge Engineering for Planning and Scheduling: Summary and Trends
    Chrpa, Lukas
    McCluskey, Thomas L.
    Vallati, Mauro
    Vaquero, Tiago
    [J]. AI MAGAZINE, 2017, 38 (01) : 104 - 106
  • [6] TOWARD A GOAL-BASED MISSION PLANNING CAPABILITY Using PDDL Based Automated Planners
    Bookless, John
    Callow, Glenn
    [J]. ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1, 2012, : 481 - 484
  • [7] PLANNERS, PLANNING AND EVALUATION OF HEALTH SERVICES
    AKWEI, E
    [J]. GHANA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 13 (02) : 129 - 134
  • [8] The 2023 International Planning Competition
    Taitler, Ayal
    Alford, Ron
    Espasa, Joan
    Behnke, Gregor
    Fiser, Daniel
    Gimelfarb, Michael
    Pommerening, Florian
    Sanner, Scott
    Scala, Enrico
    Schreiber, Dominik
    Segovia-Aguas, Javier
    Seipp, Jendrik
    [J]. AI MAGAZINE, 2024, 45 (02) : 280 - 296
  • [9] The 3rd International Planning Competition: Results and analysis
    Long, D
    Fox, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2003, 20 : 1 - 59
  • [10] A Survey of the Seventh International Planning Competition
    Coles, Amanda
    Coles, Andrew
    Garcia Olaya, Angel
    Jimenez, Sergio
    Linares Lopez, Carlos
    Sanner, Scott
    Yoon, Sungwook
    [J]. AI MAGAZINE, 2012, 33 (01) : 83 - 88