USING BONUS MONETARY INCENTIVES TO ENCOURAGE WEB RESPONSE IN MIXED-MODE HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS

被引:24
|
作者
Biemer, Paul P. [1 ,2 ]
Murphy, Joe [3 ]
Zimmer, Stephanie [4 ]
Berry, Chip [5 ]
Deng, Grace [5 ]
Lewis, Katie [5 ]
机构
[1] RTI Int, Stat, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[3] RTI Int, 230 W Monroe St,Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60606 USA
[4] RTI Int, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[5] US Energy Informat Adm, 1000 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20585 USA
关键词
Incentives; Mixed-mode survey; Nonresponse; Paper questionnaire; RECS; Representativity; Web; MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE; METAANALYSIS; RATES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1093/jssam/smx015
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This paper builds on prior research on alternative protocols for conducting mixed-mode surveys by mail where respondents are asked to complete either a web questionnaire or a paper questionnaire. We present the results from a 4 x 2 factorial experiment in which the first factor, the survey protocol, varied the modes initially offered (either web alone or both web and paper) as well as the order in which they are offered in subsequent follow-up contacts (either concurrently or sequentially). This factor was crossed with a second factor offering various promised incentive amounts and response options (a $5 prepaid incentive with a promise of either $10 or $20 for response). Our research sought to evaluate the differences between protocols/incentive treatments relative to their costs, response rates, respondent choice of web versus paper response, and consistency with benchmark estimates in other large-scale surveys. Specifically, we introduce a new protocol referred to as choicethorn (i.e., choice plus) that presents both web and paper response options concurrently at the initial request, but promises a bonus ($10) incentive for choosing the web option. Results presented are from the 2015 Residential Energy Consumption Survey National Pilot study-an experimental component of the main Residential Energy Consumption Survey sponsored by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 261
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPROVING RESPONSE TO WEB AND MIXED-MODE SURVEYS
    Millar, Morgan M.
    Dillman, Don A.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2011, 75 (02) : 249 - 269
  • [2] The Mode Effect in Mixed-Mode Surveys Mail and Web Surveys
    Borkan, Bengue
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2010, 28 (03) : 371 - 380
  • [3] Response rates for mixed-mode surveys using mail and e-mail/Web
    Converse, Patrick D.
    Wolfe, Edward W.
    Huang, Xiaoting
    Oswald, Frederick L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2008, 29 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [4] Mixed-mode contacts in web surveys - Paper is not necessarily better
    Porter, Stephen R.
    Whitcomb, Michael E.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2007, 71 (04) : 635 - 648
  • [5] The promise and challenge of pushing respondents to the Web in mixed-mode surveys
    Dillman, Don A.
    [J]. SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 2017, 43 (01) : 3 - 30
  • [6] Response Rates and Mode Preferences in Web-Mail Mixed-Mode Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
    Shih, Tse-Hua
    Fan, Xitao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERNET SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (01) : 59 - 82
  • [7] USE OF MONETARY INCENTIVES IN NATIONAL ASSESSMENT HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
    CHROMY, JR
    HORVITZ, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1978, 73 (363) : 473 - 478
  • [8] The interplay of incentives and mode-choice design in self-administered mixed-mode surveys
    Stadtmueller, Sven
    Beuthner, Christoph
    Christmann, Pablo
    Gummer, Tobias
    Kluge, Rebekka
    Sand, Matthias
    Silber, Henning
    [J]. BMS-BULLETIN OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY-BULLETIN DE METHODOLOGIE SOCIOLOGIQUE, 2023, 159 (01): : 49 - 74
  • [10] DO INTERVIEWERS MODERATE THE EFFECT OF MONETARY INCENTIVES ON RESPONSE RATES IN HOUSEHOLD INTERVIEW SURVEYS?
    Kibuchi, Eliud
    Sturgis, Patrick
    Durrant, Gabriele B.
    Maslovskaya, Olga
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2020, 8 (02) : 264 - 284