Method multi-criteria decision-making method for site selection analysis and evaluation of urban integrated energy stations based on geographic information system

被引:12
|
作者
Wang, Yongli [1 ]
Tao, Siyi [1 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ]
Huang, Feifei [1 ]
Xu, Xiaomin [1 ]
Liu, Xiaoli [1 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
Liu, Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Integrated energy systems; Integrated energy stations; GIS; Site selection; TOPSIS; Gray correlation; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER-PLANTS; SOLAR FARMS; GIS-AHP; OFFSHORE WIND; SCALE; FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; LOCATIONS; SUITABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.087
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an important carrier of multi-energy coupling of regional integrated energy system, the integrated energy station integrates a variety of energy coupling devices, which can fulfill interconnection and complementarity of energy between regions and enhance the economic and environmental benefits of energy use. In the planning of integrated energy stations, it is necessary to consider the characteristics of regional resource endowments and load energy consumption. In this paper geographic information system (GIS) is introduced into the site selection planning of integrated energy stations, and a location decision model is built based on GIS & improved TOPSIS. In order to verify this for the feasibility of the model, Tianjin, China is selected as a representative case for empirical research. First, according to Chinese national standards and local planning requirements, GIS is adopted to initially screen the distribution and area of exclusion areas and viable areas for construction in the study area. Secondly, a comprehensive evaluation index system is established for nature, economy and society, in which the AHP method is used for calculate the weight of each index to obtain the final optimal alternative with the integration of the GIS geographic layer overlay function. Finally, the improved TOPSIS model is used to rank the alternatives and obtain the ranking results. Sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis is conducted on the ranking results, indicating a higher priority of selecting sites A1, A4, A5 and A11. Analysis result effectively verifies that the improved TOPSIS method can improve the accuracy of the site selection decision for integrated energy stations. This paper can provide support for the site selection and layout of integrated energy stations, effectively improve the decision-making level and work efficiency of decision-makers, and enrich the application space of GIS methods in the energy field. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 292
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection
    Feng, Jianghong
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (06) : 8039 - 8070
  • [2] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection
    Jianghong Feng
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 8039 - 8070
  • [3] Urban integrated energy system construction plan selection: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Zhao, Haoran
    Guo, Sen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [4] Land capability evaluation for identifying industrial zones: combination multi-criteria decision-making method with geographic information system
    M. Salari
    S. M. Shariat
    R. Rahimi
    S. Dashti
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 16 : 5501 - 5512
  • [5] Land capability evaluation for identifying industrial zones: combination multi-criteria decision-making method with geographic information system
    Salari, M.
    Shariat, S. M.
    Rahimi, R.
    Dashti, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 16 (10) : 5501 - 5512
  • [6] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [7] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    [J]. MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [8] Comprehensive evaluation for plan selection of urban integrated energy systems: A novel multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Ke, Yiming
    Liu, Jiwei
    Meng, Jie
    Fang, Shinuo
    Zhuang, Shiqiang
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 81
  • [9] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology for conveyor system selection
    Jiamruangjarus, Pairat
    Naenna, Thanakorn
    [J]. COGENT ENGINEERING, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [10] Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method
    San Cristobal, J. R.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (02) : 498 - 502