New approaches to fertility awareness-based methods: Incorporating the Standard Days and TwoDay Methods into practice

被引:7
|
作者
Germano, Elaine
Jennings, Victoria
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Inst Reprod Hlth, Washington, DC 20008 USA
[2] Providence Hosp, Washington, DC USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Nurse Midwifery Program, Washington, DC 20008 USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC 20008 USA
关键词
CycleBeads; family planning; fertility awareness; midwifery; Standard Days Method; TwoDay Method;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.05.002
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Helping clients select and use appropriate family planning methods is a basic component of midwifery care. Many women prefer nonhormonal, nondevice methods, and may be interested in methods that involve understanding their natural fertility. Two new fertility awareness-based methods, the Standard Days Method and the TwoDay Method, meet the need for effective, easy-to-provide, easy-to-use approaches. The Standard Days Method is appropriate for women with most menstrual cycles between 26 and 32 days long. Women using this method are taught to avoid unprotected intercourse on potentially fertile days 8 through 19 of their cycles to prevent pregnancy. They use CycleBeads, a color-coded string of beads representing the menstrual cycle, to monitor their cycle days and cycle lengths. The Standard Days Method is more than 95% effective with correct use. The TwoDay Method is based on the presence or absence of cervical secretions to identify fertile days. To use this method, women are taught to note everyday whether they have secretions. If they had secretions on the current day or the previous day, they consider themselves fertile. The TwoDay Method is 96% effective with correct use. Both methods fit well into midwifery practice.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:471 / 477
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning
    Simmons, Rebecca G.
    Jennings, Victoria
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 66 : 68 - 82
  • [3] 'Fertility Awareness-Based Methods' and subfertility: a systematic review
    Thijssen, A.
    Meier, A.
    Panis, K.
    Ombelet, W.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2014, 6 (03): : 113 - 123
  • [4] Fertility Awareness-Based Methods FOR Family Planning: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Jensen, Ashley
    Wrede, Jane
    JOURNAL OF CHRISTIAN NURSING, 2020, 37 (04) : 212 - 220
  • [5] Fertility Awareness-Based Methods: Another Option for Family Planning
    Pallone, Stephen R.
    Bergus, George R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 22 (02) : 147 - 157
  • [6] Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention A Systematic Review
    Urrutia, Rachel Peragallo
    Polis, Chelsea B.
    Jensen, Elizabeth T.
    Greene, Margaret E.
    Kennedy, Emily
    Stanford, Joseph B.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (03): : 591 - 604
  • [7] Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Women's Health and Family Planning
    Duane, Marguerite
    Stanford, Joseph B.
    Porucznik, Christina A.
    Vigil, Pilar
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [8] Medical students' Knowledge of Fertility awareness-Based Methods of Family Planning
    Danis, Peter G.
    Kurz, Sally A.
    Covert, Laura M.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 4
  • [9] Effectiveness of fertility awareness-based methods for pregnancy prevention during the postpartum period
    Redmond, James J.
    Jensen, Elizabeth T.
    Stanford, Joseph B.
    Greene, Margaret E.
    Kennedy, Emily
    Urrutia, Rachel Peragallo
    CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 114 : 32 - 40
  • [10] Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception: systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Grimes, DA
    Gallo, MF
    Grigorieva, V
    Nanda, K
    Schulz, KF
    CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 72 (02) : 85 - 90