The global environmental paw print of pet food

被引:40
|
作者
Alexander, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Berri, Aiden [1 ]
Moran, Dominic [2 ,3 ]
Reay, David [1 ]
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Drummond St, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Global Acad Agr & Food Secur, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin EH25 9RG, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Roslin Inst, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin EH25 9RG, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res, Atmospher Environm Res, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Environmental footprint; Food security; Greenhouse gas emissions; Land use; Water use; Animal by-products; ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS; COMPANION DOGS; CONSUMPTION; LAND; SUSTAINABILITY; INGREDIENTS; IMPACTS; CATS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102153
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global pet ownership, especially of cats and dogs, is rising with income growth, and so too are the environmental impacts associated with their food. The global extent of these impacts has not been quantified, and existing national assessments are potentially biased due to the way in which they account for the relative impacts of constituent animal by-products (ABPs). ABPs typically have lower value than other animal products (i.e. meat, milk and eggs), but are nevertheless associated with non-negligible environmental impacts. Here we present the first global environmental impact assessment of pet food. The approach is novel in applying an economic value allocation approach to the impact of ABPs and other animal products to represent better the environmental burden. We find annual global dry pet food production is associated with 56-151 Mt CO2 equivalent emissions (1.1%-2.9% of global agricultural emissions), 41-58 Mha agricultural land-use (0.8-1.2% of global agricultural land use) and 5-11 km3 freshwater use (0.2-0.4% of water extraction of agriculture). These impacts are equivalent to an environmental footprint of around twicethe UK land area, and would make greenhouse gas emission from pet food around the 60th highest emitting country, or equivalent to total emissions from countries such as Mozambique or the Philippines. These results indicate that rising pet food demand should be included in the broader global debate about food system sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What is the ecological paw print of a pet?
    Louwerens, Tessa
    [J]. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DIERGENEESKUNDE, 2018, 143 (03) : 8 - 11
  • [2] CARBON PAW PRINT
    Logan, Jim
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2019, 241 (3213) : 57 - 57
  • [3] A neglected predictor of environmental damage: The ecological paw print and carbon emissions of food consumption by companion dogs and cats in China
    Su, Bingtao
    Martens, Pim
    Enders-Slegers, Marie-Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 194 : 1 - 11
  • [4] The Ecological Paw Print of Companion Dogs and Cats
    Martens, Pim
    Su, Bingtao
    Deblomme, Samantha
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2019, 69 (06) : 467 - 474
  • [5] Global environmental footprint of food
    Jan Weinzettel
    Richard Wood
    [J]. Nature Food, 2023, 4 : 543 - 544
  • [6] Global environmental footprint of food
    Weinzettel, Jan
    Wood, Richard
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2023, 4 (7): : 543 - 544
  • [7] Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway
    Naqvi, K. Razi
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 452 (7183) : 28 - 28
  • [8] Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway
    K. Razi Naqvi
    [J]. Nature, 2008, 452 : 28 - 28
  • [9] The environmental footprint of global food production
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Frazier, Melanie
    Verstaen, Juliette
    Rayner, Paul-Eric
    Clawson, Gage
    Blanchard, Julia L.
    Cottrell, Richard S.
    Froehlich, Halley E.
    Gephart, Jessica A.
    Jacobsen, Nis S.
    Kuempel, Caitlin D.
    McIntyre, Peter B.
    Metian, Marc
    Moran, Daniel
    Nash, Kirsty L.
    Tobben, Johannes
    Williams, David R.
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 5 (12) : 1027 - +
  • [10] The environmental footprint of global food production
    Benjamin S. Halpern
    Melanie Frazier
    Juliette Verstaen
    Paul-Eric Rayner
    Gage Clawson
    Julia L. Blanchard
    Richard S. Cottrell
    Halley E. Froehlich
    Jessica A. Gephart
    Nis S. Jacobsen
    Caitlin D. Kuempel
    Peter B. McIntyre
    Marc Metian
    Daniel Moran
    Kirsty L. Nash
    Johannes Többen
    David R. Williams
    [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2022, 5 : 1027 - 1039