Measuring the teamwork performance of teams in crisis situations: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties

被引:53
|
作者
Boet, Sylvain [1 ]
Etherington, Nicole [2 ]
Larrigan, Sarah [3 ]
Yin, Li [3 ]
Khan, Hira [4 ]
Sullivan, Katrina [2 ]
Jung, James J. [5 ]
Grantcharov, Teodor P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Carleton Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Fac Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] St Michaels Hosp, Div Gen Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; NONTECHNICAL SKILLS; SIMULATED TRAUMA; COGNITIVE AIDS; NOTECHS SCALE; EMERGENCY; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008260
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Educational interventions to improve teamwork in crisis situations have proliferated in recent years with substantial variation in teamwork measurement. This systematic review aimed to synthesise available tools and their measurement properties in order to identify the most robust tool for measuring the teamwork performance of teams in crisis situations. Methods Searches were conducted in Embase (via OVID), PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Resources Information Center, Medline and Medline In-Process (via OVID) (through 12 January 2017). Studies evaluating the measurement properties of teamwork assessment tools for teams in clinical or simulated crisis situations were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predetermined criteria and completed data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results The search yielded 1822 references. Twenty studies were included, representing 13 assessment tools. Tools were primarily assessed in simulated resuscitation scenarios for emergency department teams. The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) had the most validation studies (n=5), which demonstrated three sources of validity (content, construct and concurrent) and three sources of reliability (internal consistency, interrater reliability and test-retest reliability). Most studies of TEAM's measurement properties were at no risk of bias. Conclusions A number of tools are available for assessing teamwork performance of teams in crisis situations. Although selection will ultimately depend on the user's context, TEAM may be the most promising tool given its measurement evidence. Currently, there is a lack of tools to assess teamwork performance during intraoperative crisis situations. Additional research is needed in this regard.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 337
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring the teamwork performance of operating room teams: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties
    Etherington, Nicole
    Larrigan, Sarah
    Liu, Henry
    Wu, Michael
    Sullivan, Katrina J.
    Jung, James
    Boet, Sylvain
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2021, 35 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [2] Measuring patient satisfaction with video consultation: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties
    Barsom, Esther Z.
    van Hees, Ewout
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Schijven, Marlies P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 36 (04) : 356 - 362
  • [3] Teamwork Assessment Tools in Obstetric Emergencies A Systematic Review
    Onwochei, Desire N.
    Halpern, Stephen
    Balki, Mrinalini
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2017, 12 (03): : 165 - 176
  • [4] Measurement properties of tools measuring mental health knowledge: a systematic review
    Wei, Yifeng
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Hayden, Jill
    Kutcher, Stan
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 16
  • [5] Measurement properties of tools measuring mental health knowledge: a systematic review
    Yifeng Wei
    Patrick J. McGrath
    Jill Hayden
    Stan Kutcher
    BMC Psychiatry, 16
  • [6] The measurement properties of assessment tools for chronic wounds: A systematic review
    Smet, Steven
    Probst, Sebastian
    Holloway, Samantha
    Fourie, Anika
    Beele, Hilde
    Beeckman, Dimitri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 121
  • [7] Measuring non-technical skills of anaesthesiologists in the operating room: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties
    Boet, S.
    Larrigan, S.
    Martin, L.
    Liu, H.
    Sullivan, K. J.
    Etherington, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 121 (06) : 1218 - 1226
  • [8] The measurement properties of existing lifestyle assessment tools are suboptimal: a systematic review
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Yong
    Xie, Xinling
    Wang, Zhi
    Liu, Yafei
    Guo, Bingwei
    Feng, Lei
    Kibir, Elminur
    Ding, Guowu
    Yin, Min
    Ge, Long
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2023,
  • [9] Evaluation of teamwork assessment tools for interprofessional simulation: a systematic literature review
    Wooding, E. L.
    Gale, T. C.
    Maynard, V.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2020, 34 (02) : 162 - 172
  • [10] Assessing teamwork performance in obstetrics: A systematic search and review of validated tools
    Fransen, Annemarie F.
    de Boer, Liza
    Kienhorst, Dieneke
    Truijens, Sophie E.
    Heimel, Pieter J. van Runnard
    Oei, S. Guid
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 216 : 184 - 191