Cardiac implantable electronic devices;
Cardiopulmonary bypass;
Circulatory arrest;
Transvenous lead extraction;
SUPERIOR VENA-CAVA;
LEAD EXTRACTION;
TRANSVENOUS PACEMAKER;
PERMANENT PACEMAKER;
CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS;
LASER SHEATH;
REMOVAL;
ENDOCARDITIS;
EXPERIENCE;
VALVE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.013
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
The growing use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has led to infections requiring intervention. These are traditionally managed using a percutaneous transvenous approach to fully extract the culpable leads. Indications for such strategies are well-established and range from simple traction to the use of powered extraction tools including laser sheaths. Where such attempts fail, or if there are further complications, then there may be need for a cardiothoracic surgical approach. Limited evidence is currently available on the merits of individual strategies, and these are mainly drawn from case reports or series. Most utilise cardiopulmonary bypass, cardioplegic arrest and entry within the right atrium to allow direct visualisation of any vegetation and safely explant all CIED components whilst avoiding perforation, valvular and paravalvular damage. In this review, we describe a number of these and the unique challenges faced by surgeons when attempting to extract CIED. It is clear that future work should concentrate on creating clear consensus and guidelines on indications, risks and measures of efficacy outcomes for various surgical techniques. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机构:
Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Durham, NC USA
Duke Clin Res Inst, 300 Morgan St, Durham, NC 27701 USADuke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Durham, NC USA
Al-Khatib, Sana M.
[J].
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE,
2024,
390
(05):
: 442
-
454