Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape configuration metrics from landscape composition metrics

被引:12
|
作者
Wei, Xiaojian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Zhanchun [4 ]
Li, Qingling [5 ]
Li, Peiling [5 ,6 ]
Xiang, Chao [7 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Technol, Sch Geomat, 418 Guanglan Rd, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Technol, Key Lab Digital Land & Resources Jiangxi Prov, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] NASG, Key Lab Watershed Ecol & Geog Environm Monitoring, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[4] Journal Nat Sci Wuhan Univ, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[6] CPC Jinniu Dist Committe, Org Dept, Chengdu 610081, Peoples R China
[7] Jiangxia Land Resources & Planning Bur, Wuhan 430200, Peoples R China
关键词
Multivariable regression analysis; Land-use categorization; Scale effect; Landscape heterogeneity; LAND-USE; SPATIAL CONFIGURATION; THEMATIC RESOLUTION; PATTERN; INDICATORS; URBANIZATION; SCALE; SUSTAINABILITY; SENSITIVITY; REGION;
D O I
10.1007/s11355-016-0314-6
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Although landscape configuration and landscape composition metrics are correlated theoretically and empirically, the effectiveness of configuration metrics from composition metrics has not been explicitly investigated. This study explored to what extent substantial information of configuration metrics increases from certain easily calculated and extensively used composition metrics and how strongly the effectiveness is influenced by different factors. The effectiveness of 12 landscape configuration metrics from the percentage of landscape (PLAND) of each land-use class and patch density (PD) was evaluated through the coefficient of determination (R (2)) of multivariate stepwise linear regression analysis of 150 town-based landscape samples from three regions. The different landscape configuration metrics from PLAND and PD presented significantly different performances in terms of effectiveness [the contagion index and aggregation index possess minimal information, and the effective mesh size (MESH) and area-weighted mean patch fractal dimension possess abundant information]. Furthermore, the effectiveness of configuration metrics showed different responses to changing cell sizes and different land-use categorization in different regions (interspersion and juxtaposition index, patch cohesion index, and MESH exhibited large variations in R (2) among the different regions). No single, uniform, consistent characteristic of effectiveness was determined across different factors. This new approach to understanding the effectiveness of configuration metrics helps clarify landscape metrics and is fundamental to landscape metric assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 181
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape configuration metrics from landscape composition metrics
    Xiaojian Wei
    Zhanchun Xiao
    Qingling Li
    Peiling Li
    Chao Xiang
    [J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2017, 13 : 169 - 181
  • [2] Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape metrics in quantifying spatial patterns
    Peng, Jian
    Wang, Yanglin
    Zhang, Yuan
    Wu, Jiansheng
    Li, Weifeng
    Li, You
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2010, 10 (02) : 217 - 223
  • [3] Measuring landscape configuration with normalized metrics
    Xianli Wang
    Steven G. Cumming
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2011, 26 : 723 - 736
  • [4] Measuring landscape configuration with normalized metrics
    Wang, Xianli
    Cumming, Steven G.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2011, 26 (05) : 723 - 736
  • [5] Using landscape composition and configuration metrics as indicators of woody vegetation attributes in tropical pastures
    Cadavid-Florez, Liliana
    Laborde, Javier
    Zahawi, Rakan A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 101 : 679 - 691
  • [6] On using landscape metrics for landscape similarity search
    Niesterowicz, Jacek
    Stepinski, Tomasz F.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 64 : 20 - 30
  • [7] Landscape Metrics for Assessment of Landscape Destruction and Rehabilitation
    FELIX HERZOG
    ANGELA LAUSCH
    ECKHARD MÜLLER
    HANS-HERMANN THULKE
    UTA STEINHARDT
    STEFFEN LEHMANN
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2001, 27 : 91 - 107
  • [8] Landscape metrics for assessment of landscape destruction and rehabilitation
    Herzog, F
    Lausch, A
    Müller, E
    Thulke, HH
    Steinhardt, U
    Lehmann, S
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (01) : 91 - 107
  • [9] Evaluating the Environmental Quality of Forest Remnants Using Landscape Metrics
    Longo, Regina Marcia
    da Silva, Alessandra Leite
    Ribeiro, Admilson Irio
    Gomes, Raissa Caroline
    Sperandio, Fabricio Camillo
    Nunes, Adelia N.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [10] Seeking Parsimony in Landscape Metrics
    Cunningham, Mary Ann
    Johnson, Douglas H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 75 (03): : 692 - 701