Does all work and no play make elite students? Evidence from the China education panel survey

被引:6
|
作者
Yang, Juan [1 ]
Zhao, Xinhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Business, 19 Xinjiekou Wai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
After-class learning time; Academic performance; Generalized propensity score matching; Dose-response function; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; HOMEWORK; TIME; SCHOOL; PERFORMANCE; BOYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102321
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper examines the role of after-class learning time in educational performance. In the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015, Chinese students spent the longest time on study out of school compared with OECD countries but ranked only 10th in mathematics, reading and science. It is doubtful that the longer students study after school, the better their academic performance will be. Based on a representative survey of middle school students in China, we draw on generalized propensity score matching to explore the causal effect between after-class learning time and academic performance, find that the two have a relatively stable "inverted U" relation, and determine that the best academic performance can be achieved when after-class learning time is kept at 3 h per day on weekdays and 8 h per day on weekends. More than these optimal times will hinder academic performance. We further find that the effect of after-class study time on academic performance varies among different groups. There is evidence that after-class learning time influences academic performance through two channels: students' perceived learning difficulty and self-efficacy. This paper concludes that in addition to the appropriate homework assigned by teachers, parents should keep extracurricular tutoring for their children within a reasonable amount of time to maximize students' academic performance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does private tutoring improve student learning in China? Evidence from the China Education Panel Survey
    Guo, Yuhe
    Chen, Qihui
    Zhai, Shengying
    Pei, Chunchen
    [J]. ASIA & THE PACIFIC POLICY STUDIES, 2020, 7 (03): : 322 - 343
  • [2] DOES ALL WORK, NO PLAY MAKE A DULL ALLOWANCE MARKET
    MAKANSI, J
    [J]. POWER, 1995, 139 (04) : 9 - 9
  • [3] Does Internet Entertainment Reduce the Cognitive Ability of Children? Evidence from the China Education Panel Survey
    Hu, Wenxin
    Mao, Yufei
    Huang, Kevin
    Sun, Yanqi
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [4] Does preschool attendance affect the urban-rural cognition gap among middle school students? Evidence from China Education Panel Survey
    Lei Zheng
    Qiuyi Weng
    Xin Gong
    [J]. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8
  • [5] Does preschool attendance affect the urban-rural cognition gap among middle school students? Evidence from China Education Panel Survey
    Zheng, Lei
    Weng, Qiuyi
    Gong, Xin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHINESE SOCIOLOGY, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [6] Does higher education make you more entrepreneurial? Causal evidence from China
    Huang, Bin
    Tani, Massimiliano
    Zhu, Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 135 : 543 - 558
  • [7] Does education matter for psychological recovery amidst the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from a panel survey in Hubei, China
    Jin, Lei
    Chen, Xi
    Lin, Fen
    Zou, Yuchun
    Gao, Haiyan
    [J]. ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2022, 35 (01): : 101 - 110
  • [8] Overseas Study Experience and Students' Attitudes toward China: Evidence from the Beijing College Students Panel Survey
    Li, Zhonglu
    Feng, Shizheng
    [J]. CHINESE SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 50 (01) : 27 - 52
  • [9] Cognitive Returns to Having Better Educated Teachers: Evidence from the China Education Panel Survey
    Liu, Ji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [10] The impact of an un(der)funded inclusive education policy: Evidence from the 2013 China education panel survey
    Tani, Massimiliano
    Xu, Lei
    Zhu, Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 190 : 768 - 784