Key Lessons from Performance of the US EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Tier 1 Male and Female Pubertal Assays

被引:11
|
作者
Stump, Donald G. [1 ]
O'Connor, John C. [2 ,3 ]
Lewis, Joseph M. [2 ,3 ]
Marty, M. Sue [4 ]
机构
[1] WIL Res Labs LLC, Dev & Reprod Toxicol, Ashland, OH USA
[2] DuPont Haskell Global Ctr Hlth Sci, Newark, DE USA
[3] DuPont Haskell Global Ctr Environm Sci, Newark, DE USA
[4] Dow Chem Co USA, Toxicol & Environm Res & Consulting, Midland, MI 48674 USA
关键词
male pubertal assay; female pubertal assay; endocrine disruptor; endocrine screening; EDSP; estrogen; androgen; thyroid; STEROID-BIOSYNTHESIS INHIBITORS; MALE-RATS; LUTEINIZING-HORMONE; SEXUAL-MATURATION; FEED RESTRICTION; THYROID-FUNCTION; WISTAR RATS; FOOD-INTAKE; HERSHBERGER; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1002/bdrb.21097
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The male and female pubertal assays, which are included in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Tier 1 battery, can detect endocrine-active compounds operating by various modes of action. This article uses the collective experience of three laboratories to provide information on pubertal assay conduct, interlaboratory reproducibility, endpoint redundancy, and data interpretation. The various criteria used to select the maximum tolerated dose are described. A comparison of historical control data across laboratories confirmed reasonably good interlaboratory reproducibility. With a reliance on apical endpoints, interpretation of pubertal assay effects as specifically endocrine-mediated or secondary to other systemic effects can be problematic and mode of action may be difficult to discern. Across 21-23 data sets, relative liver weight, a nonspecific endocrine endpoint, was the most commonly affected endpoint in male and female assays. For endocrine endpoints, patterns of effects were generally seen; rarely was an endocrine-sensitive endpoint affected in isolation. In males, most frequently missed EPA-established performance criteria included mean weights for kidney and thyroid, and the coefficient of variation for age and body weight at preputial separation, seminal vesicle weight, and final body weight. In females, the frequently missed EPA-established performance criteria included mean adrenal weight and mean age at vaginal opening. To ensure specificity for endocrine effects, the pubertal assays should be interpreted using a weight-of-evidence approach as part of the entire EDSP battery. Based on the frequency with which certain performance criteria were missed, an EPA review of these criteria is warranted. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 62
页数:20
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Key Learnings from Performance of the US EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Tier 1 In Vitro Assays
    LeBaron, Matthew J.
    Coady, Katie K.
    O'Connor, John C.
    Nabb, Diane L.
    Markell, Lauren K.
    Snajdr, Suzanne
    Marty, M. Sue
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART B-DEVELOPMENTAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 101 (01) : 23 - 42
  • [2] Key Learnings from the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Tier 1 Rodent Uterotrophic and Hershberger Assays
    Marty, M. Sue
    O'Connor, John C.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART B-DEVELOPMENTAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 101 (01) : 63 - 79
  • [3] A Comparative Assessment of Four In Vivo Assays Included in the Tier 1 Screening Battery for the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) in the Sprague-Dawley Rat
    Coder, P. S.
    Tanchevski, E.
    Mesnard, J. L.
    Sloter, E. D.
    Stump, D. G.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2013, 97 (05) : 334 - 334
  • [4] Evaluation of Hydroxyatrazine in the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Program's Male and Female Pubertal Protocols
    Stoker, Tammy E.
    Hallinger, Daniel R.
    Seely, John C.
    Zorrilla, Leah M.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART B-DEVELOPMENTAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 98 (05) : 428 - 435
  • [5] EDSP21: The Incorporation of In Silico Models and In Vitro High Throughput Assays in the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) for Prioritization and Screening
    Lynn, S. G.
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-ANIMAL, 2012, 48 : 13 - 13
  • [6] Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Tier 1 In Vitro Assays Indicate Glyphosate Does Not Interact With Estrogen and Androgen Receptors nor Inhibit Steroidogenesis
    Webb, E. G.
    Saltmiras, D. A.
    Levine, S. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 32 (01) : 77 - 77
  • [7] Current status of the US EPA's endocrine disruptor screening program
    Farmer, Donna R.
    Levine, Steven L.
    Wakimori, Hiroo
    JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 2009, 34 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [8] EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Background and evaluation of Tier 1 results from chemical case studies
    Browne, P.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 104 (11) : 144 - 144
  • [9] Application of an Integrated Testing Strategy to the US EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
    Willett, Catherine E.
    Bishop, Patricia L.
    Sullivan, Kristie M.
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 123 (01) : 15 - 25
  • [10] Lessons Learned, Challenges, and Opportunities: The US Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
    Juberg, Daland R.
    Borghoff, Susan J.
    Becker, Richard A.
    Casey, Warren
    Hartung, Thomas
    Holsapple, Michael P.
    Marty, M. Sue
    Mihaich, Ellen M.
    Van der Kraak, Glen
    Wade, Michael G.
    Willett, Catherine E.
    Andersen, Melvin E.
    Borgert, Christopher J.
    Coady, Katherine K.
    Dourson, Michael L.
    Fowle, John R., III
    Gray, L. Earl
    Lamb, James C.
    Ortego, Lisa S.
    Schug, Thaddeus T.
    Toole, Colleen M.
    Zorrilla, Leah M.
    Kroner, Oliver L.
    Patterson, Jacqueline
    Rinckel, Lori A.
    Jones, Brett R.
    ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2014, 31 (01) : 63 - 78