Genetic selection of non-linear product terms in the inputs to a linear classifier for handwritten digit recognition

被引:0
|
作者
Perez, CA [1 ]
Gonzalez, GD [1 ]
Salinas, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Dept Elect Engn, Santiago, Chile
关键词
linear classifier; neural network classifier; non-linear inputs; genetic selection; handwritten digit classification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study is to compare neural network and linear system based models in 2-D pattern recognition tasks. Using a linear classifier, non-linear inputs are generated based on the linear inputs using different forms of generating products. These nonlinear inputs form a candidate set from which nonlinear inputs are selected to improve classification performance. A genetic search is performed to find an appropriate set of non-linear inputs. The method is applied to the handwritten digit recognition problem. Results show that the linear model with linear inputs reaches a classification performance on the testing database of 79.3%. However, when nonlinear inputs selected by the genetic algorithm were used, and included as new inputs, the classification performance increased up to 92.8%. These results are compared with those of three non-linear neural network models widely used in classification tasks using the same database. A single-layer Perceptron with linear inputs reached 81.0% of correct classification. Perceptron models having a single-hidden layer and two-hidden layers reached classification results of 90.1% and 92.5%, respectively. Therefore, these results show that a linear classifier with an appropriate set of non-linear inputs reached a classification performance similar or better than those obtained by nonlinear neural network classifiers with one and two-hidden layer and with linear inputs.
引用
收藏
页码:2337 / 2342
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ON THE NON-LINEAR PRICING OF INPUTS
    ORDOVER, JA
    PANZAR, JC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1982, 23 (03) : 659 - 675
  • [2] Iterative Learning of Fisher Linear Discriminants for Handwritten Digit Recognition
    Qin Feng
    Gao Daqi
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2013,
  • [3] A systematic approach to classifier selection on combining multiple classifiers for handwritten digit recognition
    Kim, J
    Seo, K
    Chung, K
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DOCUMENT ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 459 - 462
  • [4] Local context in non-linear deformation models for handwritten character recognition
    Keysers, D
    Gollan, C
    Ney, H
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 4, 2004, : 511 - 514
  • [5] Recognition of benzene, toluene and xylene using TGS array integrated with linear and non-linear classifier
    Szczurek, A
    Maciejewska, M
    [J]. TALANTA, 2004, 64 (03) : 609 - 617
  • [6] Variable selection and training set design for particle classification using a linear and a non-linear classifier
    Heisel, Stefan
    Kovacevic, Tijana
    Briesen, Heiko
    Schembecker, Gerhard
    Wohlgemuth, Kerstin
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2017, 173 : 131 - 144
  • [7] GENERALIZED NON-LINEAR SPARSE CLASSIFIER
    Majumdar, A.
    Ward, R. K.
    Aboulnasr, T.
    [J]. 2013 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2013,
  • [8] Feature subset selection using genetic algorithms for handwritten digit recognition
    Oliveira, LS
    Benahmed, N
    Sabourin, R
    Bortolozzi, F
    Suen, CY
    [J]. XIV BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 362 - 369
  • [9] COMPARISON OF SOLUTIONS OF NON-LINEAR EVOLUTION PROBLEMS WITH DIFFERENT NON-LINEAR TERMS
    BENILAN, P
    DIAZ, JI
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 1982, 42 (03) : 241 - 257
  • [10] Confidence intervals in a regression with both linear and non-linear terms
    Davies, Robert
    Withers, Christopher
    Nadarajah, Saralees
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2011, 5 : 603 - 618