Can risk explain the profitability of technical trading in currency markets?

被引:6
|
作者
Ivanova, Yuliya [1 ]
Neely, Christopher J. [2 ]
Weller, Paul [3 ]
Famiglietti, Matthew T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Promontory Financial Grp, 801 17th St NW,Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[2] Fed Reserve Bank St Louis, POB 442, St Louis, MO 63166 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Exchange rate; Technical analysis; Efficient markets hypothesis; Risk; Stochastic discount factor; Adaptive markets hypothesis; FOREIGN-EXCHANGE MARKET; CROSS-SECTION; RETURNS; RULE; PREMIA; EFFICIENCY; NOISE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102285
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Academic studies show that technical trading rules would have earned substantial excess returns over long periods in foreign exchange markets. However, the approach to risk adjustment has typically been rather cursory. We examine the ability of a wide range of models: CAPM, quadratic CAPM, downside risk CAPM, Carhart's 4-factor model, the C-CAPM, an extended C-CAPM with durable consumption, Lustig-Verdelhan (LV) carry trade factor model, and models including macroeconomic factors, and foreign exchange volatility, skewness and liquidity, to explain these technical trading returns. No model plausibly accounts for much of the technical profitability. This failure implicitly supports non-risk based explanations such as adaptive markets. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条