Influence of herbicide application rate, timing, and interrow cultivation on weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield in glufosinate-resistant and glyphosate-resistant corn

被引:40
|
作者
Tharp, BE [1 ]
Kells, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
glufosinate; 2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl)butanoic acid; glyphosate; N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine; corn; Zea mays L-'DK 493GR'; herbicide-tolerant crops; Abutilon theophrasti; Amaranthus retroflexus; Chenopodium album; Setaria faberi; Zea mays; ABUTH; AMARE; CHEAL; SETFA;
D O I
10.1017/S0890037X00042263
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Field trials were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to determine the influence of glufosinate and glyphosate application rates, application timings, and interrow cultivation on weed control and corn yield. Glufosinate-ammonium rates ranged from 0.18 to 0.41 kg ai/ha, while rates for the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate ranged from 0.21 to 0.84 kg ae/ha. Increasing rates of glufosinate and glyphosate often improved weed control. Control of many of the weed species was improved by delaying herbicide application timing. Weed control was most consistent from late postemergence (LPOST) applications of glufosinate at 0.41 kg ai/ha or glyphosate at 0.84 kg ae/ha. Corn yields were reduced due to incomplete weed control when the lowest rate of glufosinate was applied. Weed control from early postemergence (EPOST) glufosinate and glyphosate applications followed by cultivation was similar to weed control from LPOST glufosinate and glyphosate applications without cultivation. Interrow cultivation following glufosinate or glyphosate application did not affect corn yield.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 813
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weed control in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays)
    Hamill, AS
    Knezevic, SZ
    Chandler, K
    Sikkema, PH
    Tardif, FJ
    Shrestha, A
    Swanton, CJ
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) : 578 - 585
  • [2] Herbicide Programs for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Volunteer Corn in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean
    Chahal, Parminder S.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 431 - 443
  • [3] Weed management in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays)
    Culpepper, AS
    York, AC
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 324 - 333
  • [4] Glufosinate combinations and row spacing for weed control in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays)
    Jones, CA
    Chandler, JM
    Morrison, JE
    Senseman, SA
    Tingle, CH
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (01) : 141 - 147
  • [5] Effect of Residual Herbicide and Postemergence Application Timing on Weed Control and Yield in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn
    Loux, Mark M.
    Dobbels, Anthony F.
    Johnson, William G.
    Young, Bryan G.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [6] An integrated weed management strategy for glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays)
    Shrestha, A
    Rajcan, I
    Chandler, K
    Swanton, CJ
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (03) : 517 - 522
  • [7] Weed control in glyphosate-resistant corn as affected by preemergence herbicide and timing of postemergence herbicide application
    Parker, Robert G.
    York, Alan C.
    Jordan, David L.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) : 564 - 570
  • [8] Control of glyphosate/glufosinate-resistant volunteer corn in corn resistant to aryloxyphenoxypropionates
    Striegel, Adam
    Lawrence, Nevin C.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    Krumm, Jeffrey T.
    Hein, Gary
    Jhala, Amit J.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (03) : 309 - 317
  • [9] Weed Control and Yield Comparisons of Glyphosate- and Glufosinate-Resistant Corn Grown in Rotation
    Reddy, Krishna N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2012, 26 (03) : 364 - 374
  • [10] Economics of weed management in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays L.)
    Bradley, PR
    Johnson, WG
    Hart, SE
    Buesinger, ML
    Massey, RE
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) : 495 - 501