The Effect of Propofol on Intrathecal Morphine-Induced Pruritus and Its Mechanism

被引:23
|
作者
Liu, Xiulan [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Zhao, Hongyan [1 ]
Mei, Hongxia [1 ]
Lian, Qingquan [1 ]
ShangGuan, WangNing [1 ]
机构
[1] WenZhou Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2014年 / 118卷 / 02期
关键词
ACID AMIDE HYDROLASE; EPIDURAL-MORPHINE; OPIOID MODULATION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; DORSAL HORN; ITCH; ANESTHESIA; ANALGESIA; MODEL; RAT;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000000086
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that a low dose of propofol IV bolus had a beneficial effect on intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus in humans. However, its exact mechanism has not been fully understood. In this study, we hypothesized that propofol relieved intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus in rats by upregulating the expression of cannabinoid-1 (CB[1]) receptors in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). METHODS: Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into a control group and 20, 40, 80 g/kg morphine groups to create an intrathecal morphine-induced scratching model. The effects of propofol on intrathecal 40 g/kg morphine-induced scratching responses were then evaluated. Sixty rats were randomly assigned to control, normal saline, intralipid, and propofol groups, with pruritus behavior observation or killed 8 minutes after venous injection of normal saline, intralipid, or propofol, and brain tissues were then collected for assay. Immunohistochemistry was then performed to identify the expression of CB (1) receptor in ACC, and the concentration of CB(1) receptor in ACC was determined by Western blot analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, rats in the 20, 40, 80 g/kg morphine groups had higher mean scratching response rates after intrathecal morphine injection (P =0.020, 0.005, and 0.002, respectively). There was a statistical difference between 20 and 40 g/kg morphine groups at 10 to 15 and 15 to 20 timepoints after intrathecal morphine injection (P = 0.049 and 0.017, respectively). Propofol almost abolished the scratching response that was induced by 40 g/kg intrathecal morphine injection (F[2, 15] = 46.87, P < 0.001; F[22, 165] = 2.37, P = 0.001). Compared with the intralipid and normal saline groups, the scratching behavior was significantly attenuated in the propofol group (P < 0.001). Compared with control, normal saline, and intralipid groups, the protein expression of CB(1) receptor in ACC (Western blot) in the propofol group increased (0.86 0.21, 0.94 +/- 0.18, 0.86 +/- 0.13, and 1.34 +/- 0.32, respectively, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference among control, normal saline, and intralipid groups. Compared with the control, normal saline, and intralipid groups, the average number of neurons of CB(1) receptor in the ACC area were higher in the propofol group (21.0 +/- 1.4, 19.3 +/- 1.8, 24.8 +/- 7.7, and 37.2 +/- 3.3, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Morphine elicits dose-independent scratching responses after intrathecal injection in rats. Morphine 40 g/kg intrathecal injection-induced scratching responses can be prevented by propofol. Increased protein expression of CB(1) receptors in ACC may contribute to the reversal of intrathecal morphine-induced scratching.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 309
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of ifenprodil on intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and its mechanism
    Wang, W. J.
    Shen, L.
    Huang, Y. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (06) : E920 - E920
  • [2] Prophylactic mirtazapine reduces intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus
    Sheen, M. J.
    Ho, S. -T.
    Lee, C. -H.
    Tsung, Y. -C.
    Chang, F. -L.
    Huang, S. -T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 101 (05) : 711 - 715
  • [3] Nalbuphine versus propofol tor treatment at intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery
    Charuluxananan, S
    Kyokong, O
    Somboonviboon, W
    Lertmaharit, S
    Ngamprasertwong, P
    Nimcharoendee, K
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (01): : 162 - 165
  • [4] EPIDURAL MORPHINE-INDUCED PRURITUS - PROPOFOL VERSUS NALOXONE
    BORGEAT, A
    SAIAH, M
    WILDERSMITH, OHG
    RIFAT, K
    SUTER, PM
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (3A) : A848 - A848
  • [5] The effect of celecoxib on intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus in patients undergoing Caesarean section
    Lee, LHY
    Irwin, MG
    Lim, J
    Wong, CK
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (09) : 876 - 880
  • [6] Prevention versus treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus with ondansetron
    Kung, A. T.
    Yang, X.
    Li, Y.
    Vasudevan, A.
    Pratt, S.
    Hess, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 23 (03) : 222 - 226
  • [7] Treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus following Caesarean section
    Alhashemi, JA
    Crosby, ET
    Grodecki, W
    Duffy, PJ
    Hull, KA
    Gallant, C
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (10): : 1060 - 1065
  • [8] Treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus following Caesarean section
    Jamal A. Alhashemi
    Edward T. Crosby
    Wlodzimierz Grodecki
    Peter J. Duffy
    Kathryn A. Hull
    Cathy Gallant
    [J]. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 1997, 44
  • [9] DOES PROPOFOL RELIEVE EPIDURAL OR SUBARACHNOID MORPHINE-INDUCED PRURITUS
    BORGEAT, A
    SAIAH, M
    RIFAT, K
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1991, 16 (04) : 245 - 245
  • [10] COMPARING DIFFERENT SUB-HYPNOTIC DOSES OF PROPOFOL TO PREVENT INTRATHECAL MORPHINE-INDUCED PRURITUS IN CAESAREAN DELIVERY
    Chua, W. Y.
    Mat, W. R. Wan
    Nor, N. Md
    Yusof, A. Mohamad
    Masdar, A.
    Rahman, R. Abdul
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 495 - 495