Efficacy of Various Percutaneous Interventions for In-Stent Restenosis Comprehensive Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:30
|
作者
Sethi, Ankur
Malhotra, Gurveen
Singh, Sukhchain
Singh, Param P.
Khosla, Sandeep
机构
[1] Rosalind Franklin Univ Med, Chicago Med Sch, Dept Cardiol, N Chicago, IL USA
[2] Mt Sinai Hosp, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
angioplasty; atherectomy; coronary restenosis; drug-eluting stents; everolimus; paclitaxel; percutaneous coronary intervention; DRUG-ELUTING STENT; PACLITAXEL-COATED BALLOON; BARE-METAL STENTS; ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY; CORONARY INTERVENTION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; TASK-FORCE; ANGIOPLASTY; IMPLANTATION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002778
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a difficult problem in interventional cardiology. The relative efficacy and safety of available interventions is not clear. We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis using both direct evidence and indirect evidence to compare all available interventions. Methods and Results We systematically searched electronic databases for randomized trials comparing 2 treatments for ISR. A network meta-analysis was performed using a Bayesian approach. Eleven treatments were compared in 31 studies with 8157 patient-years follow-up. Compared with balloon angioplasty, everolimus-eluting stent (hazard ratio [95% credibility interval], 0.13 [0.048-0.35]), paclitaxel-eluting balloon (0.32 [0.20-0.49]), paclitaxel-eluting cutting balloon (0.054 [0.0017-0.5]), paclitaxel-eluting stent (0.39 [0.24-0.62]), and sirolimus-eluting stent (0.32 [0.18-0.50]) are associated with lower target vessel revascularization. Balloon angioplasty is not different from cutting balloon (0.73 [0.31-1.5]), excimer laser (0.89 [0.29-2.7]), rotational atherectomy (0.96 [0.53-1.7]), and vascular brachytherapy (0.60 [0.35-1.0]). In drug-eluting stent ISR, balloon angioplasty was inferior to everolimus-eluting stent (0.19 [0.049-0.76]), paclitaxel-eluting balloon (0.43 [0.18-0.80]), paclitaxel-eluting stent (0.35 [0.13-0.76]), and sirolimus-eluting stent (0.36 [0.11-0.86]) for target vessel revascularization. There was no difference between treatments in probable or definitive stent thrombosis. The results of binary restenosis and target lesion revascularization were similar. Paclitaxel-eluting cutting balloon, everolimus-eluting stent, and paclitaxel-eluting balloon have the highest probability of being in the top 3 treatments based on low target lesion revascularization, but there was no statistical significant difference between them. Conclusions Balloon angioplasty is inferior to all drug-eluting treatments for ISR, including drug-eluting stent ISR. Drug-eluting stent, particularly everolimus-eluting stent, or paclitaxel-eluting cutting balloon and paclitaxel-eluting balloon should be preferred for treating ISR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and efficacy of treatments for in stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Perversi, J.
    Moretti, C.
    Omede', P.
    D'ascenzo, F.
    Gasparini, M.
    Rebagliati, M.
    Colombo, F.
    Cerrato, E.
    Gaita, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 800 - 801
  • [2] Comparative efficacy of interventional therapies and devices for coronary in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guo, Shitian
    Bi, Chenchen
    Wang, Xiang
    Lv, Tingting
    Zhang, Ziyi
    Chen, Xinyi
    Yan, Junwei
    Mao, Dandan
    Huang, Wenxi
    Ye, Mengfei
    Liu, Zheng
    Xie, Xiaojie
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (06)
  • [3] Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Balloons for Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis of 8 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gao, Shen
    Shen, Jing
    Mukku, Venkata Kishore
    Wang, Mei Jia
    Akhtar, Muzina
    Liu, Wei
    [J]. ANGIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (07) : 612 - 621
  • [4] Interventional Strategies for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Hierarchical Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Giacoppo, Daniele
    Gargiulo, Giuseppe
    Aruta, Patrizia
    Capranzano, Piera
    Tamburino, Corrado
    Capodanno, Davide
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (15) : B202 - B202
  • [5] Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Stefanini, Giulio G.
    Mavridis, Dimitris
    Siontis, Konstantinos C.
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Perez-Vizcayno, Maria J.
    Byrne, Robert A.
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Meier, Bernhard
    Salanti, Georgia
    Jueni, Peter
    Windecker, Stephan
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 386 (9994): : 655 - 664
  • [6] Effect of thiazolidinediones on in-stent restenosis in patients after coronary stenting: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Geng, Deng-feng
    Jin, Dong-mei
    Wu, Wei
    Wang, Zhi
    Wang, Jing-feng
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2009, 202 (02) : 521 - 528
  • [7] Efficacy of drug eluting balloons for patients with in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trails
    Liu, W.
    Gao, G. S.
    Zhou, Z. Y. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 1164 - 1164
  • [8] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of intracoronary gamma- and beta-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis
    Uchida, Takahiro
    Bakhai, Ameet
    Almonacid, Alexandra
    Shibata, Taro
    Cox, Barbra
    Kuntz, Richard E.
    [J]. HEART AND VESSELS, 2006, 21 (06) : 368 - 374
  • [9] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of intracoronary gamma- and beta-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis
    Takahiro Uchida
    Ameet Bakhai
    Alexandra Almonacid
    Taro Shibata
    Barbra Cox
    Richard E. Kuntz
    [J]. Heart and Vessels, 2006, 21 : 368 - 374
  • [10] Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent For In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Giacoppo, Daniele
    Capodanno, Davide
    Capranzano, Piera
    Aruta, Patrizia
    Tamburino, Corrado
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (11) : B81 - B81