Evaluating investment strategies for distribution networks based on yardstick competition and DEA

被引:15
|
作者
Liu, Youbo [1 ]
Wang, Mingjuan [1 ]
Liu, Xianglong [1 ]
Xiang, Yue [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Coll Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Distribution network investment; Projection pursuit method; Dynamic DEA; Yardstick competition; Reward and punishment regime; ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION; PROJECTION PURSUIT; PERFORMANCE; METHODOLOGY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2019.105868
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The traditional investment for distribution networks is mainly evaluated and conducted from the static perspective. A dynamic comprehensive evaluation method is essential to obtain an efficient investment strategy. Firstly, a hierarchical evaluation index system is constructed to describe the overall performance of the distribution network, which includes six types of criteria such as information level, power supply capacity, asset utilization efficiency and economy, power supply quality and loss, power supply reliability, and sustainable development level. Each criterion is composed of input and output indicators. Then, using projection pursuit method considering subjective weight constraints, a combined weight optimization model is proposed to calculate the weight vector of each criterion. Furthermore, the data envelopment analysis (DEA) based dynamic evaluation approach is set up to compute the investment efficiency defined as ratio of output and input. The time degree theory is also introduced to realize dynamic evaluation. Via yardstick competition among multiple regions and "reward and punishment" rule, a precise investment planning strategy can be achieved while minimizing construction cost and maximizing efficiency of the resource allocation. The numerical results on a practical 10-region distribution system in four planning cycles verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEA and Dynamic Yardstick Competition in Scandinavian Electricity Distribution
    PER J. AGRELL
    Peter Bogetoft
    Jørgen Tind
    [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2005, 23 : 173 - 201
  • [2] DEA and dynamic yardstick competition in scandinavian electricity distribution
    Agrell, PJ
    Bogetoft, P
    Tind, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2005, 23 (02) : 173 - 201
  • [3] DEA based yardstick competition in natural resource management
    Bogetoft, P
    Nielsen, K
    [J]. RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN APPLIED FOREST ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 2003, 74 : 103 - 125
  • [4] YARDSTICK COMPETITION AND INVESTMENT INCENTIVES
    Dalen, Dag Morten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 1998, 7 (01) : 105 - 126
  • [5] DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation
    Peter Bogetoft
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 1997, 73 : 277 - 298
  • [6] DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation
    Bogetoft, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 73 (0) : 277 - 298
  • [7] Supply chain contracts based on yardstick competition
    Zhang, Jianjun
    Gao, Chengxiu
    Lei, Dong
    [J]. Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 1663 - 1672
  • [8] Distribution pricing based on yardstick regulation
    Lima, JWM
    Noronha, JCC
    Arango, H
    dos Santos, PES
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (01) : 198 - 204
  • [9] Integration of price cap and yardstick competition schemes in electrical distribution regulation
    Rudnick, H
    Donoso, JA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (04) : 1428 - 1433
  • [10] Distribution access pricing: Application of the OFTEL rule to a yardstick competition scheme
    Recordon, E
    Rudnick, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (04) : 1001 - 1007