Motivational interviewing to promote interconception health: A scoping review of evidence from clinical trials

被引:7
|
作者
Gregory, Emily F. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Maddox, Adya I. [1 ,2 ]
Levine, Lisa D. [3 ]
Fiks, Alexander G. [1 ,2 ]
Lorch, Scott A. [2 ,4 ]
Resnicow, Kenneth [5 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat, Div Gen Pediat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia Res Inst, Ctr Pediat Clin Effectiveness, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn, Maternal & Child Hlth Res Ctr, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, 2720 South St,10252, Philadelphia, PA 19146 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Interconception health; Preconception health; Motivational interviewing; Motivational enhancement; Health behavior change; Preventive health care; Postpartum care; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SECONDHAND SMOKE EXPOSURE; BRIEF INTERVENTION; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; FOLLOW-UP; DRUG-USE; POSTPARTUM; DEPRESSION; EFFICACY; MOTHERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Promoting interconception health can improve birth outcomes and long-term women's health. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based behavior change strategy that can address interconception health behaviors and health care engagement. Objective: This scoping review assessed the evidence for using MI to promote interconception health and assessed features of successful MI interventions. Methods: We searched PubMed, CHINAL, and Cochrane databases for clinical trials that involved an MI inter-vention and at least one comparison group published by 8/31/2021. Interventions occurred during pregnancy or within three months postpartum and outcomes were measured between birth and one year postpartum. We abstracted data on trial characteristics including outcome, population, interventionist training, MI fidelity monitoring, intervention dose, and comparison condition. We examined whether trials that demonstrated sta-tistically significant improvement in outcomes had common features. Results: There were 37 included studies. Interventions addressed breastfeeding, teen contraception, tobacco, alcohol, or substance use, vaccine acceptance, nutrition, physical activity, and depression. No trials addressed more than one topic. Nineteen studies demonstrated improved outcomes. Interventions during the perinatal or postnatal periods were more likely to demonstrate improved interconception outcomes than interventions in the prenatal period. No other trial characteristics were consistently associated with demonstrating improved outcomes. Discussion: MI has been applied to a variety of interconception health behaviors, with some promising results, particularly for interventions in the perinatal or postpartum period. Outcomes were not clearly attributable to any other differences in intervention or study design. Further exploring context or implementation may help maximize the potential of MI in interconception health promotion. Practical value: MI may be implemented across a range of clinical settings, patient groups, and time points around pregnancy. Interventions on health topics relevant to the interconception period should incorporate perinatal or postpartum components.
引用
收藏
页码:3204 / 3212
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence for motivational interviewing in educational settings among medical schools: a scoping review
    Lei, Leonard Yik Chuan
    Chew, Keng Sheng
    Chai, Chee Shee
    Chen, Yoke Yong
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [2] Motivational Interviewing to Promote Oral Health in Adolescents
    Wu, Lingli
    Gao, Xiaoli
    Lo, Edward C. M.
    Ho, Samuel M. Y.
    McGrath, Colman
    Wong, May C. M.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2017, 61 (03) : 378 - 384
  • [3] Motivational interviewing in health settings: a review
    Britt, E
    Hudson, SM
    Blampied, NM
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 53 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [4] Does motivational interviewing promote oral health in adolescents?
    Hawrot H.
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2021, 22 (4) : 134 - 135
  • [5] Motivational Interviewing in Improving Oral Health: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Gao, Xiaoli
    Lo, Edward Chin Man
    Kot, Shirley Ching Ching
    Chan, Kevin Chi Wai
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2014, 85 (03) : 426 - 437
  • [6] Adoption of Motivational Interviewing and Motivational Enhancement Therapy Following Clinical Trials
    Guydish, Joseph
    Jessup, Martha
    Tajima, Barbara
    Manser, Sarah Turcotte
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, 2010, : 215 - 226
  • [7] Motivational interviewing to promote health outcomes and behaviour change in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
    Dorstyn, Diana S.
    Mathias, Jane L.
    Bombardier, Charles H.
    Osborn, Amanda J.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 34 (03) : 299 - 309
  • [8] Comparing process evaluations of motivational interviewing interventions for managing health conditions and health promotions: A scoping review
    Rimayanti, Made U.
    O'Halloran, Paul D.
    Shields, Nora
    Morris, Rebecca
    Taylor, Nicholas F.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (05) : 1170 - 1180
  • [9] Motivational interviewing and diet modification: A review of the evidence
    VanWormer, JJ
    Boucher, JL
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2004, 30 (03): : 404 - +
  • [10] Challenges and Solutions for Improved Oral Health: Examples from Motivational Interviewing Trials
    Jamieson, L. M.
    Garcia, R. I.
    Sohn, W.
    Albino, J.
    JDR CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 5 (02) : 107 - 108