'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review

被引:67
|
作者
Burns, Katharina Kovacs [1 ,2 ]
Bellows, Mandy [3 ]
Eigenseher, Carol [3 ]
Gallivan, Jennifer [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Hlth Sci Council, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Interdisciplinary Hlth Res Acad, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[3] Alberta Hlth Serv, Patient Engagement Dept, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
关键词
Patient engagement; Scoping literature review; Resource Kit; Engagement tools; Education; Infrastructure; Evaluation;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-14-175
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Extensive literature exists on public involvement or engagement, but what actual tools or guides exist that are practical, tested and easy to use specifically for initiating and implementing patient and family engagement, is uncertain. No comprehensive review and synthesis of general international published or grey literature on this specific topic was found. A systematic scoping review of published and grey literature is, therefore, appropriate for searching through the vast general engagement literature to identify 'patient/family engagement' tools and guides applicable in health organization decision-making, such as within Alberta Health Services in Alberta, Canada. This latter organization requested this search and review to inform the contents of a patient engagement resource kit for patients, providers and leaders. Methods: Search terms related to 'patient engagement', tools, guides, education and infrastructure or resources, were applied to published literature databases and grey literature search engines. Grey literature also included United States, Australia and Europe where most known public engagement practices exist, and Canada as the location for this study. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set, and include: English documents referencing 'patient engagement' with specific criteria, and published between 1995 and 2011. For document analysis and synthesis, document analysis worksheets were used by three reviewers for the selected 224 published and 193 grey literature documents. Inter-rater reliability was ensured for the final reviews and syntheses of 76 published and 193 grey documents. Results: Seven key themes emerged from the literature synthesis analysis, and were identified for patient, provider and/or leader groups. Articles/items within each theme were clustered under main topic areas of 'tools', 'education' and 'infrastructure'. The synthesis and findings in the literature include 15 different terms and definitions for 'patient engagement', 17 different engagement models, numerous barriers and benefits, and 34 toolkits for various patient engagement and evaluation initiatives. Conclusions: Patient engagement is very complex. This scoping review for patient/family engagement tools and guides is a good start for a resource inventory and can guide the content development of a patient engagement resource kit to be used by patients/families, healthcare providers and administrators.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ‘Practical’ resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review
    Katharina Kovacs Burns
    Mandy Bellows
    Carol Eigenseher
    Jennifer Gallivan
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [2] Impact of Patient Engagement on Healthcare Quality: A Scoping Review
    Marzban, Sima
    Najafi, Marziye
    Agolli, Arjola
    Ashrafi, Ensieh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [3] Patient and family engagement interventions for hospitalized patient safety: A scoping review
    Cai, Yan
    Liu, Yuan
    Wang, Cong
    Liu, Shanshan
    Zhang, Mingming
    Jiang, Yan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (06) : 2099 - 2111
  • [4] Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
    Sagen, Joachim Storen
    Smedslund, Geir
    Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth
    Habberstad, Andreas
    Kjeken, Ingvild
    Dagfinrud, Hanne
    Moe, Rikke Helene
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [5] A scoping review examining the availability of dialogue-based resources to support healthcare providers engagement with vaccine hesitant individuals
    Karras, Joshua
    Dube, Eve
    Danchin, Margie
    Kaufman, Jessica
    Seale, Holly
    [J]. VACCINE, 2019, 37 (44) : 6594 - 6600
  • [6] Patient and family engagement in patient safety in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a scoping review
    Abdi, Zhaleh
    Ravaghi, Hamid
    Sarkhosh, Samaneh
    Nafar, Hamideh
    Khani, Sedigheh
    Letaief, Mondher
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] Quality of patient, family, caregiver and public engagement in decision-making in healthcare systems: a scoping review protocol
    Hamilton, Clayon
    Snow, M. Elizabeth
    Clark, Nancy
    Gibson, Shannon
    Dehnadi, Maryam
    Lui, Michelle
    Koster, Andrew
    McLean, Janet
    Li, Linda C.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [8] Patient, family and caregiver engagement in diabetes care: a scoping review protocol
    Chamoun, Dita
    Ramasamy, Mathankki
    Ziegler, Carolyn
    Yu, Catherine H.
    Wijeyesekera, Pauline
    Advani, Andrew
    Pritlove, Cheryl
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [9] STRATEGIES FOR PATIENT, FAMILY, AND CAREGIVER ENGAGEMENT: A SCOPING REVIEW AND EVIDENCE MAP
    Bennett, Wendy L.
    Aboumatar, Hanan
    Pitts, Samantha I.
    Day, Jeff
    Holzhauer, Kate
    Das, Asar
    Sharma, Ritu
    Bass, Eric B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (SUPPL 1) : S279 - S280
  • [10] Virtual Patient and Family Engagement Strategies in Critical Care: A Scoping Review
    Solomon, Joshua
    Gabbay, Daniel
    Goldfarb, Michael
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2024, 30 (08) : e2203 - e2213