Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging

被引:43
|
作者
Makarov, Danil V. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Loeb, Stacy [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ulmert, David [6 ]
Drevin, Linda [5 ]
Lambe, Mats [5 ,8 ]
Stattin, Par [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] US Dept Vet Affairs, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[3] NYU, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY USA
[4] NYU, Inst Canc, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Reg Canc Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[7] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci Urol & Androl, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden
[8] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
STAGING EVALUATION; BONE-SCAN; APPROPRIATE; ANTIGEN; RISK; PREVALENCE; SURVIVAL; OVERUSE; MEN;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djt175
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Reducing inappropriate use of imaging to stage incident prostate cancer is a challenging problem highlighted recently as a Physician Quality Reporting System quality measure and by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Urological Association in the Choosing Wisely campaign. Since 2000, the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden has led an effort to decrease national rates of inappropriate prostate cancer imaging by disseminating utilization data along with the latest imaging guidelines to urologists in Sweden. We sought to determine the temporal and regional effects of this effort on prostate cancer imaging rates. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study among men diagnosed with prostate cancer from the NPCR from 1998 to 2009 (n = 99 879). We analyzed imaging use over time stratified by clinical risk category (low, intermediate, high) and geographic region. Generalized linear models with a logit link were used to test for time trend. Results Thirty-six percent of men underwent imaging within 6 months of prostate cancer diagnosis. Overall, imaging use decreased over time, particularly in the low-risk category, among whom the imaging rate decreased from 45% to 3% (P < .001), but also in the high-risk category, among whom the rate decreased from 63% to 47% (P < .001). Despite substantial regional variation, all regions experienced clinically and statistically (P < .001) significant decreases in prostate cancer imaging. Conclusions A Swedish effort to provide data on prostate cancer imaging use and imaging guidelines to clinicians was associated with a reduction in inappropriate imaging over a 10-year period, as well as slightly decreased appropriate imaging in high-risk patients. These results may inform current efforts to promote guideline-concordant imaging in the United States and internationally.
引用
收藏
页码:1306 / 1313
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends after a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (05): : 1287 - 1288
  • [2] CONTEMPORARY TRENDS OF IMAGING AFTER PRIMARY TREATMENT FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Washington, Sam
    Tranh Trang
    Trusedale, Matthew
    Cowan, Janet
    Carroll, Peter
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E831 - E831
  • [3] TEMPORAL CHANGES AND REGIONAL VARIATION IN PROSTATE CANCER IMAGING IN A NATION-WIDE, POPULATION-BASED COHORT FOLLOWING AN EFFORT TO DISCOURAGE INAPPROPRIATE USE
    Makarov, Danil
    Loeb, Stacy
    Ulmert, David
    Drevin, Linda
    Lambe, Mats
    Stattin, Par
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E52 - E53
  • [4] INAPPROPRIATE IMAGING OF MEN DIAGNOSED WITH LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Luk, E. J.
    Wang, J.
    Ledet, E.
    Stolten, M.
    Dotiwala, A. K.
    Silberstein, J.
    Sartor, A. O.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 62 (02) : 566 - 566
  • [5] Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate after Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Patel, Pritesh
    Mathew, Melvy S.
    Trilisky, Igor
    Oto, Aytekin
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2018, 38 (02) : 437 - 449
  • [6] Prostate Cancer Imaging
    Schieda, Nicola
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (01)
  • [7] Prostate cancer imaging
    Maria Picchio
    Morand Piert
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2013, 40 : 1 - 4
  • [8] Imaging for Prostate Cancer
    Zechmann C.M.
    Current Radiology Reports, 3 (7)
  • [9] Imaging prostate cancer
    Hricak, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (04): : 1329 - 1330
  • [10] Imaging of prostate cancer
    Akin, Oguz
    Hricak, Hedvig
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 45 (01) : 207 - +