Re-Evaluating the Field Tourniquet for the Canadian Forces

被引:17
|
作者
Savage, Erin [1 ]
Pannell, Dylan [1 ,2 ]
Payne, Elspeth [1 ]
O'Leary, Terrance [1 ]
Tien, Homer [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Forces Hlth Serv, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
COMBAT CASUALTY CARE; SYSTEMS; TRAUMA; DEATH;
D O I
10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the best field tourniquet for Medical Technician (Med Tech) use in the Canadian Forces (CF). Methods: We conducted a prospective controlled trial, comparing the efficacy and ease of applicability of 3 types of commercially available windlass tourniquets in 4 tactical situations on simulated patients. The primary outcome was time to tourniquet application with secondary outcomes including effectiveness and Med Tech satisfaction. Results: The overall finding of this study indicates that the Combat Application Tourniquet (C-A-T) was applied the fastest in each scenario and was also significantly the most effective in occluding distal blood flow. The survey results show that the 3 tourniquet types are similar in many of the measures of ease of learning and application, with the C-A-T scoring highest in self-application and the Special Operations Forces Tactical Tourniquet Wide having the lowest scores for both durability and effectiveness. Conclusion: When tested on a group of CF Med Techs, the C-A-T remained the CF field tourniquet of choice, based on the assessed criteria. Although there is inherent bias in the approach of this study, it reflects the process required to determine if a new piece of kit is superior to what is already considered the standard to a trained and equipped military.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 675
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Men in nursing: Re-evaluating masculinities, re-evaluating gender
    Brown, Brian
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2009, 33 (02) : 120 - 129
  • [2] A sense of place: Re-evaluating regionalism in Canadian and American writing
    Jacobs, HLM
    [J]. GREAT PLAINS QUARTERLY, 2000, 20 (03) : 237 - 238
  • [3] A sense of place: Re-evaluating regionalism in Canadian and American writing
    Palmer Seiler, T
    [J]. ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE, 2000, 31 (03) : 189 - 191
  • [4] Re-evaluating the Anthropocene
    Dalby, Simon
    [J]. ANTIQUITY, 2016, 90 (350) : 514 - 515
  • [5] Re-evaluating Evaluation
    Balduzzi, David
    Tuyls, Karl
    Perolat, Julien
    Graepel, Thore
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31
  • [6] Re-Evaluating "Community"
    O'Donnell, Kathleen M.
    [J]. ARCHITECT, 2018, 107 (12): : 59 - 59
  • [7] RE-EVALUATING THE REVEL
    不详
    [J]. GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2012, 16 (11): : 635 - 635
  • [8] Re-evaluating EMS
    不详
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2009, 164 (22) : 669 - 669
  • [9] Re-evaluating prokaryotic species
    Gevers, D
    Cohan, FM
    Lawrence, JG
    Spratt, BG
    Coenye, T
    Feil, EJ
    Stackebrandt, E
    Van de Peer, Y
    Vandamme, P
    Thompson, FL
    Swings, J
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 3 (09) : 733 - 739
  • [10] Re-evaluating Web evaluation
    Notess, GR
    [J]. ONLINE, 2006, 30 (01): : 45 - 47