Sophisticated investors and market efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment

被引:49
|
作者
Chen, Yong [1 ]
Kelly, Bryan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Management, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[3] AQR Capital Management, Greenwich, CT 06830 USA
[4] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Hedge funds; Information environment; Market efficiency; Information acquisition; Analyst coverage; HEDGE FUND ACTIVISM; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; INFORMATION ACQUISITION; ANALYST COVERAGE; PRESIDENTIAL-ADDRESS; STOCK; INVESTMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERFORMANCE; PRICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.06.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We study how sophisticated investors, when faced with shocks to information environ-ment, change their information acquisition and trading behavior, and how these changes in turn affect market efficiency. We find that, after exogenous reductions of analyst coverage due to closures and mergers of brokerage firms, hedge funds scale up information acquisition, trade more aggressively, and earn higher abnormal returns on the affected stocks. The hedge fund participation also mitigates the impairment of market efficiency caused by coverage reductions. Overall, in a causal framework, our findings suggest a substitution effect between sophisticated investors and public information providers in facilitating market efficiency. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 341
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Presidential Address: Sophisticated Investors and Market Efficiency
    Stein, Jeremy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2009, 64 (04): : 1517 - 1548
  • [2] Do market prices reveal the decision models of sophisticated investors? Evidence from the laboratory
    Chewning, EG
    Coller, M
    Tuttle, B
    [J]. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2004, 29 (08) : 739 - 758
  • [3] Do inflowing sophisticated investors induce classification shifting? New evidence from market liberalisation in China
    Lu, Junwei
    Bu, Xiaoxia
    Chen, Jing
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2021, 61 (05): : 6193 - 6223
  • [4] MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM A NO-BUBBLE ASSET MARKET EXPERIMENT
    Lei, Vivian
    Vesely, Filip
    [J]. PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 14 (02) : 246 - 258
  • [5] Is There Monopsony in the Labor Market? Evidence from a Natural Experiment
    Staiger, Douglas O.
    Spetz, Joanne
    Phibbs, Ciaran S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (02) : 211 - 236
  • [6] Transparency in the equity market: Evidence from a natural experiment
    Chiou, Wan-Jiun Paul
    Serrano, Alejandro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 89 : 1348 - 1368
  • [7] The impact of carbon risk on the pricing efficiency of the capital market: Evidence from a natural experiment in china
    Gao, Bin
    Zhang, Jinlong
    Xie, Jun
    Zhang, Wenjie
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 57
  • [8] Why investors do not buy cheaper securities: Evidence from a natural experiment
    Chan, Kalok
    Wang, Baolian
    Yang, Zhishu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2019, 101 : 59 - 76
  • [9] Decentralisation and supply efficiency: evidence from a natural experiment
    Asthana, Anand N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING REVIEW, 2013, 35 (01) : 67 - 86
  • [10] Do investors respond to tax reform? Evidence from a natural experiment in Germany
    Sauter, Nicolas
    Winter, Joachim
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 108 (02) : 193 - 196