Impact of retained embryos on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies

被引:26
|
作者
Lee, HC [1 ]
Seifer, DB [1 ]
Shelden, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
embryo transfer; retained embryo; pregnancy rate;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.035
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of embryo retention in the embryo transfer catheter followed by "immediate" retransfer on pregnancy outcome in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Design: Retrospective analysis of embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. Setting: Assisted reproductive technology practice in a university in vitro fertilization program. Patient(s): In vitro fertilization charts for 1,812 embryo transfer cycles representing 1,139 patients between January 1997 and March 2002 were reviewed. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Pregnancy rate, implantation rate, delivery rate. Result(s): Three embryo transfer cycles were excluded from analysis because of missing data, leaving 1,364 embryo transfers during oocyte recovery cycles and 445 embryo transfer cycles using thawed embryos. Seventy-one embryo transfers (3.9% of all transfers) were complicated by finding retained embryos after the initial embryo transfer-all retained embryos were immediately retransferred. There was no difference in the frequency of retained embryos during oocyte retrieval versus thawed embryo cycles. The pregnancy, implantation, and delivery rates per embryo transfer were not negatively affected by embryo(s) retained in the transfer catheter. Age, fresh versus frozen embryo, use of ultrasound during the procedure, or transferring physician did not influence pregnancy outcome. Conclusion(s): Immediate retransfer of embryos retained in the catheter following the initial transfer attempt did not have an adverse effect on pregnancy outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 337
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies
    Katz, P
    Nachtigall, R
    Showstack, J
    [J]. NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2002, 4 : S29 - S32
  • [2] The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies
    Katz P.
    Nachtigall R.
    Showstack J.
    [J]. Nature Medicine, 2002, 8 (Suppl 10) : S29 - S32
  • [3] The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies
    Katz, P
    Nachtigall, R
    Showstack, J
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2002, 8 : 29 - 32
  • [4] Effect of myomectomy on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies
    Surrey, ES
    Minjarez, DA
    Stevens, JM
    Schoolcraft, WB
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (05) : 1473 - 1479
  • [5] Selection and Conservation of Gametes and Embryos for Improving Assisted Reproductive Technologies
    Gambini, Andres
    Ortiz, Isabel
    Hidalgo, Manuel
    Dorado, Jesus
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (17):
  • [6] The impact of assisted reproductive technologies in the human experience
    Brezina, Paul R.
    [J]. MINERVA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 2018, 43 (01) : 34 - 36
  • [7] Influence of regional adiposity on assisted reproductive technologies outcome
    Ferreira, F.
    Moura-Ramos, M.
    Sousa, A. P.
    Almeida-Santos, T.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 304 - 305
  • [8] The effect of vaginal microbiota on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies
    Karaer, A.
    Dogan, B.
    Tuncay, G.
    Gunal, S.
    Tecellioglus, A. N.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 115 - 115
  • [9] Recent cigarette smoking and assisted reproductive technologies outcome
    Fuentes, Ariel
    Munoz, Alex
    Barnhart, Kurt
    Arguello, Begona
    Diaz, Marina
    Pommer, Ricardo
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (01) : 89 - 95
  • [10] The impact of endometriosis on the outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Gonzalez-Comadran, Mireia
    Enrique Schwarze, Juan
    Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
    Souza, Maria do Carmo B.
    Carreras, Ramon
    Angel Checa, Miguel
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 15