Testing the multicomponent model of intergroup attitudes and accompanied open-ended measures

被引:0
|
作者
Franc, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Drustvenih Znanosti Ivo Pilar, Zagreb 10001, Croatia
来源
DRUSTVENA ISTRAZIVANJA | 2000年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
According to the multicomponent model of intergroup attitudes our attitudes towards groups are based on emotions toward group members, beliefs about specific characteristics of members of the social group and beliefs about which values are promoted or blocked by the group members. The first aim of this study was to check the validity and reliability of the open-ended measures for assessing components of attitudes towards groups, and the second aim was to test the multicomponent model of intergroup attitudes. The study examined attitudes toward two groups as attitude objects. General attitude was assessed by semantic differential scales. On the bases of data analysis with regard to the content and favorability of subjects' (N = 119) free-responses it was concluded that open-ended measures are valid indicators of attitudinal components. The split-half reliability of open ended measures are satisfactory although lower than mean reliability indices found in literature, A multiple regression analysis revealed that stereotypes provided a significant contribution to the prediction of attitude towards both groups. Affective responses were a significant unique predictor for attitude towards only one group whereas symbolic beliefs in both cases were not predictive of the general attitude. The results do not support the importance of symbolic beliefs as a part of the cognitive basis of attitudes, which is the main new part of the multicomponent model of intergroup attitudes with regard to the general multicomponent model of attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 101
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The utility of open-ended measures to assess intergroup ambivalence
    Bell, DW
    Esses, VM
    Maio, GR
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 1996, 28 (01): : 12 - 18
  • [2] The Development and Testing of an Instrumented Open-Ended Model Pile
    Igoe, David
    Doherty, Paul
    Gavin, Kenneth
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2010, 33 (01): : 72 - 82
  • [3] On the use of open-ended measures to assess attitudinal components
    Haddock, G
    Zanna, MP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 37 : 129 - 149
  • [4] Open-ended coaxial probe: Model limitations
    Ellison, William J.
    Moreau, Jacques-Marie
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2008, 57 (09) : 1984 - 1991
  • [5] AN EXTENDED MODEL FOR OPEN-ENDED FLUOROSENSOR PROBES
    LIDEN, G
    NIKLASSON, C
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 1993, 9 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [6] Webcam testing: Validation of an innovative open-ended multimedia test
    Oostrom, Janneke K.
    Born, Marise Ph.
    Serlie, Alec W.
    van der Molen, Henk T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 19 (05) : 532 - 550
  • [7] A Procedure for Testing for Tokyo Type 1 Open-Ended Evolution
    Channon, Alastair
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2024, 30 (03) : 345 - 355
  • [8] TESTING OF MEDICAL-STUDENTS WITH OPEN-ENDED, UNCUED QUESTIONS
    DAMJANOV, I
    FENDERSON, BA
    VELOSKI, JJ
    RUBIN, E
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1995, 26 (04) : 362 - 365
  • [10] Midlife aging, open-ended planning, and laboratory measures of executive function
    Garden, SE
    Phillips, LH
    MacPherson, SE
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 15 (04) : 472 - 482