Prospective gymnasium teachers' conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching

被引:68
|
作者
Koballa, T [1 ]
Gräber, W
Coleman, DC
Kemp, AC
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Sci Educ Dept, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Inst Padag Nat Wissensch, Dept Chem, Kiel, Germany
[3] Cedar Shoals High Sch, Clarke Cty Sch, Athens, GA USA
[4] Univ Louisville, Dept Secondary Educ, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/095006900289967
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to investigate prospective gymnasium teachers' conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching. Data were collected through individual interviews with nine prospective teachers at One German university. Phenomenography served as the methodological framework for the study. The findings revealed that chemistry learning is conceptualized as gaining knowledge, problem-solving and constructing personal understandings; and that chemistry teaching is:conceptualized as transferring knowledge, problem-posing and interacting with pupils. The majority of the prospective teachers' conceptions of learning chemistry were considered reproductive rather-than constructive and their conceptions of chemistry teaching were viewed as facilitating reproductive learning. Comparisons of the dominant conceptions of learning chemistry and teaching chemistry held by each prospective teacher revealed mixed support for the assumption that if one holds a reproductive (or constructive) conception of teaching, then (s)he will also hold a reproductive (or constructive) conception of learning. Support for the assumption was found in the reproductive-oriented relationship between conceptions of learning chemistry as gaining knowledge and of teaching chemistry as transferring knowledge, but not found in the relationships between learning chemistry as problem-solving and teaching chemistry as problem-posing and between learning chemistry as gaining knowledge and interacting with pupils.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 224
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective teachers' conceptions and values about learning from teaching
    Phelps, Christine M.
    Spitzer, Sandy M.
    [J]. TEACHERS AND TEACHING, 2015, 21 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [2] The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation
    van Driel, JH
    Bulte, AMW
    Verloop, N
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2005, 27 (03) : 303 - 322
  • [3] A Study of Prospective Primary Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching And Learning School Geometry
    Manuel Barrantes
    Lorenzo J. Blanco
    [J]. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2006, 9 (5) : 411 - 436
  • [4] A STUDY OF PROSPECTIVE PRIMARY TEACHERS' CONCEPTIONS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING SCHOOL GEOMETRY
    Barrantes, Manuel
    Blanco, Lorenzo J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION, 2006, 9 (05) : 411 - 436
  • [5] Prospective teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis
    Saban, Ahmet
    Kocbeker, Beyhan Nazli
    Saban, Aslihan
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2007, 17 (02) : 123 - 139
  • [6] Secondary teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning
    Boulton-Lewis, GM
    Smith, DJH
    McCrindle, AR
    Burnett, PC
    Campbell, KJ
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2001, 11 (01) : 35 - 51
  • [7] PROSPECTIVE SCIENCE TEACHERS' CONCEPTIONS OF THE SOLUTION CHEMISTRY
    Ozden, Mustafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2009, 8 (02): : 69 - 78
  • [8] TEACHING AND LEARNING FROM THE CONCEPTIONS OF TEACHERS AND STUDENTS
    Correa Cruz, Lucelly
    Arbelaez Campillo, Diego Felipe
    [J]. AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2012, 1 (01): : 94 - 105
  • [9] Prospective secondary science teachers' conceptions of the methodology of teaching
    Solis Ramirez, Emilio
    Porlan Ariza, Rafael
    Rivero, Ana
    Martin del Pozo, Rosa
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE PEDAGOGIA, 2012, 70 (253): : 495 - 514
  • [10] The Progression of Prospective Primary Teachers’ Conceptions of the Methodology of Teaching
    Ana Rivero
    Pilar Azcárate
    Rafael Porlán
    Rosa Martín del Pozo
    Joao Harres
    [J]. Research in Science Education, 2011, 41 : 739 - 769