Using Electronic Health Record Data to Develop and Validate a Prediction Model for Adverse Outcomes in the Wards

被引:102
|
作者
Churpek, Matthew M. [1 ,2 ]
Yuen, Trevor C. [1 ]
Park, Seo Young [3 ]
Gibbons, Robert [2 ]
Edelson, Dana P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Hlth Studies, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
hospital rapid response team; in-hospital cardiac arrest; physiologic monitoring; quality improvement; track and trigger; MEDICAL EMERGENCY TEAM; EARLY WARNING SCORES; CARDIAC-ARREST; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ACTIVATION CRITERIA; TRIGGER SYSTEMS; RISK PATIENTS; VITAL SIGNS; DETERIORATION;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000000038
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Over 200,000 in-hospital cardiac arrests occur in the United States each year and many of these events may be preventable. Current vital sign-based risk scores for ward patients have demonstrated limited accuracy, which leads to missed opportunities to identify those patients most likely to suffer cardiac arrest and inefficient resource utilization. We derived and validated a prediction model for cardiac arrest while treating ICU transfer as a competing risk using electronic health record data. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: An academic medical center in the United States with approximately 500 inpatient beds. Patients: Adult patients hospitalized from November 2008 until August 2011 who had documented ward vital signs. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Vital sign, demographic, location, and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic health record and investigated as potential predictor variables. A person-time multinomial logistic regression model was used to simultaneously predict cardiac arrest and ICU transfer. The prediction model was compared to the VitalPAC Early Warning Score using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and was validated using three-fold cross-validation. A total of 56,649 controls, 109 cardiac arrest patients, and 2,543 ICU transfers were included. The derived model more accurately detected cardiac arrest (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.88 vs 0.78; p < 0.001) and ICU transfer (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77 vs 0.73; p < 0.001) than the VitalPAC Early Warning Score, and accuracy was similar with cross-validation. At a specificity of 93%, our model had a higher sensitivity than the VitalPAC Early Warning Score for cardiac arrest patients (65% vs 41%). Conclusions: We developed and validated a prediction tool for ward patients that can simultaneously predict the risk of cardiac arrest and ICU transfer. Our model was more accurate than the VitalPAC Early Warning Score and could be implemented in the electronic health record to alert caregivers with real-time information regarding patient deterioration.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 848
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Develop and validate a computable phenotype for the identification of Alzheimer's disease patients using electronic health record data
    He, Xing
    Wei, Ruoqi
    Huang, Yu
    Chen, Zhaoyi
    Lyu, Tianchen
    Bost, Sarah
    Tong, Jiayi
    Li, Lu
    Zhou, Yujia
    Li, Zhao
    Guo, Jingchuan
    Tang, Huilin
    Wang, Fei
    DeKosky, Steven
    Xu, Hua
    Chen, Yong
    Zhang, Rui
    Xu, Jie
    Guo, Yi
    Wu, Yonghui
    Bian, Jiang
    [J]. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA: DIAGNOSIS, ASSESSMENT & DISEASE MONITORING, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [2] Hyperchloremia in critically ill patients: association with outcomes and prediction using electronic health record data
    Yeh, Pete
    Pan, Yiheng
    Sanchez-Pinto, L. Nelson
    Luo, Yuan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (Suppl 14)
  • [3] Hyperchloremia in critically ill patients: association with outcomes and prediction using electronic health record data
    Pete Yeh
    Yiheng Pan
    L. Nelson Sanchez-Pinto
    Yuan Luo
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20
  • [4] Using linked electronic data to validate algorithms for health outcomes in administrative databases
    Lee, Wan-Ju
    Lee, Todd A.
    Pickard, Alan Simon
    Shoaibi, Azadeh
    Schumock, Glen T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (04) : 359 - 366
  • [5] A Simulated Prospective Evaluation and Comparison of a Deep Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Adverse Outcomes from Electronic Health Record Data
    Shah, P.
    Ginestra, J. C.
    Ungar, L. H.
    Junker, P.
    Rohrbach, J. I.
    Fishman, N.
    Weissman, G. E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [6] Development and validation of an asthma exacerbation prediction model using electronic health record (EHR) data
    Martin, Alfred
    Bauer, Victoria
    Datta, Avisek
    Masi, Christopher
    Mosnaim, Giselle
    Solomonides, Anthony
    Rao, Goutham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2020, 57 (12) : 1339 - 1346
  • [7] ADVERSE OUTCOMES DURING THE TRANSITION TO A NEW ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD
    Barnett, Michael L.
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    Jena, Anupam B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 : S117 - S117
  • [8] Validation of Prediction Models for Critical Care Outcomes Using Natural Language Processing of Electronic Health Record Data
    Marafino, Ben J.
    Park, Miran
    Davies, Jason M.
    Thombley, Robert
    Luft, Harold S.
    Sing, David C.
    Kazi, Dhruv S.
    DeJong, Colette
    Boscardin, W. John
    Dean, Mitzi L.
    Dudley, R. Adams
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (08)
  • [9] Development of An Individualized Risk Prediction Model for COVID-19 Using Electronic Health Record Data
    Mamidi, Tarun Karthik Kumar
    Tran-Nguyen, Thi K.
    Melvin, Ryan L.
    Worthey, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA, 2021, 4
  • [10] Using Machine Learning to Identify Health Outcomes from Electronic Health Record Data
    Wong, Jenna
    Murray Horwitz, Mara
    Zhou, Li
    Toh, Sengwee
    [J]. CURRENT EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 5 (04) : 331 - 342