Chinese online public opinions on the Two-Child Policy

被引:8
|
作者
Wang, Shixiong [1 ]
Song, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Dept China Studies, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
China; Weibo; Opinion mining; Birth behaviours; Family planning policy; GOVERNMENT; WEIBO; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1108/OIR-07-2017-0217
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use Weibo as a window to examine the Chinese netizens' online attitudes and responses to two sets of population policy: the Selective Two-Child Policy (Phase 2) and the Universal Two-Child Policy. The population policy change from the rigid One-Child Policy to the Selective Two-Child Policy then to the Universal Two-Child Policy aroused great attention of the Chinese people. Design/methodology/approach This research uses the crawler technique to extract data on the Sina Weibo platform. Through opinion mining of Weibo posts on two sets of population policy, the Weibo users' online opinions on the Two-Child Policy are analyzed from two perspectives: their attention intensity and sentiment tendency. The research also use the State Bureau of Statistics of China's national population data between 2011 and 2016 to examine the Chinese people's actual birth behaviors after implementing the two different sets of the Two-Child Policy. Findings The research findings indicate that the Selective Two-Child Policy (Phase 2) and the Universal Two-Child Policy are good examples of thematic public sphere of Weibo. Weibo posts on the two sets of the Two-Child Policy have undergone different opinion cycles. People from economically developed regions and populous regions have paid more attention to both sets of Two-Child Policy than their counterparts in the less developed and less populated regions. Men pay more attention to the Two-Child Policy than women do. Despite people's huge attention to the new population policy, the population growth after the policy is not sustainable. Research limitations/implications The new population policy alone is difficult to boost China's population within a short period of time. The Chinese Government must provide its people with enough incentives and supporting welfare to make the population growth happen. Originality/value These findings have important implications for understanding the dynamics of online opinion formation and changing population policy in China.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 403
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Two-Child Policy in China
    Wang Peiann
    [J]. China Population Today, 2016, 33 (02) : 44 - 44
  • [2] Significance and Problems of Two-Child Policy
    Wang, Jinguo
    Wang, Na
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH (ICEEMR 2017), 2017, 95 : 528 - 530
  • [3] Two-child policy,to accelerate diapers
    Y.C.
    [J]. China Textile, 2016, (02) : 60 - 60
  • [4] Interpretation of the Universal Two-child Policy in China
    Editorial Department
    [J]. China Population Today, 2015, 32 (06) : 9 - 19
  • [5] The two-child policy in China: what to expect?
    不详
    [J]. LANCET, 2013, 382 (9907): : 1758 - 1758
  • [6] The Influence of Two-Child Policy on Women Employment and Policy Suggestions
    Huang Liping
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM - FEMALE SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, : 448 - 452
  • [7] Examining the effects of a two-child policy in rural India
    Mandal, Bidisha
    Wu, Wenjun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESEARCH, 2023, 40 (03)
  • [8] Two-child policy in China: Rhetoric versus reality
    Padmadas, Sabu S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2017, 44 (02) : 97 - 98
  • [9] Influence of the universal two-child policy on obstetric issues
    Zhao, Fang
    Xu, Yang
    Chen, Yan-Ting
    Cheng, Jiao-Ying
    Pan, Xiao-Yu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 252 : 479 - 482
  • [10] Fertility choices in China under the two-child policy
    Wang Qingfeng
    Sun Xu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOCIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (03) : 284 - 311