A Study on AI Creations and Patent Law Protection

被引:0
|
作者
Saito, Ayuki [1 ]
Baccelli, Michele [2 ]
Kobayashi, Kazuto [3 ]
Hiratsuka, Mitsuyoshi [4 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Patent Attorney, Matsumoto shi, Nagano, Japan
[2] HOFFMANN EITLE, Munich, Germany
[3] Tokyo Inst Technol, Meguro Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Tokyo Univ Sci, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Inventorship; AI; Patent;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_12
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The process of conceiving an invention, how AI may contribute to the conception process, and how AI inventions should be protected by patent law are examined. In our approach and analysis, AI remains in the category of sophisticated tools used by natural persons to create inventions. The approach is assessed against a decision by the Australian Federal Court acknowledging that the AI machine DABUS can be held as an inventor. As a result of our study, however, we believe that it is at least questionable whether DABUS can be considered an autonomous inventor. Thus, in those cases where someone names an AI machine as the inventor, we propose setting a high standard of proof in requesting to produce as evidence the actual machine output claimed as the invention and to illustrate how the machine operates to arrive at such output.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 143
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protection of patent law objects, created by artificial intelligence (AI) technologies
    Pavlyuk, Olha
    Parasiuk, Nataliia
    Dutko, Alona
    Parasiuk, Vasyl
    Stasiv, Oksana
    [J]. AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2021, 10 (44): : 230 - 240
  • [2] Patent pending: the law on AI inventorship
    Adde, Laura
    Smith, Joel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW & PRACTICE, 2021, 16 (02) : 97 - 98
  • [3] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND PATENT LAW
    Machnicka, Agnieszka A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW: CONTEMPORARY CONCERNS AND CHALLENGES: CONTEMPORARY CONCERNS AND CHALLENGES, 2012, : 405 - 419
  • [4] STATE-LAW PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL CREATIONS - PRIVACY AND PREEMPTION
    DABNEY, JW
    [J]. SYRACUSE LAW REVIEW, 1987, 38 (02) : 653 - 681
  • [5] The real role of AI in patent law debates
    Lizarralde, Marta Duque
    Contreras, Hector Axel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 30 (01): : 23 - 46
  • [6] PATENT LAW AND THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
    Espinosa, Sophia F.
    [J]. NTUT JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 1 (02): : 159 - 174
  • [7] Patent Protection and Copyright Law of All Countries
    Lenhoff, Arthur
    [J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1939, 39 (04) : 748 - 748
  • [8] Patent protection for medical treatment - A distinction between patent and medical law
    Thums, D
    [J]. IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT LAW, 1996, 27 (04): : 423 - 447
  • [9] Harnessing AI in drug discovery without losing patent protection
    Hervey, Matt
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2020, 25 (06) : 949 - 950
  • [10] Patentability under Turkish Patent Law According to the Decree Law No. 551 on the Protection of Patent Rights
    Bak, Basak
    [J]. WORLD CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2015, : 301 - 308