The Implications of Brexit for UK and EU Regional Competitiveness

被引:26
|
作者
Thissen, Mark [1 ]
van Oort, Frank [2 ,3 ]
McCann, Philip [4 ]
Ortega-Argiles, Raquel [5 ]
Husby, Trond [1 ]
机构
[1] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, NL-2500 GH The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Tinbergen Inst, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Management, Sheffield S10 2TG, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, City REDI Inst, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
European regional development; Brexit; impact analysis; competitiveness; regional inequality; TRADE;
D O I
10.1080/00130095.2020.1820862
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Any form of Brexit will impact heterogeneously in terms of sectors and regions on the competitive position of firms in both the UK and Europe. The ongoing uncertainty about the conditions under which the UK will be leaving the EU creates difficulties in structurally estimating these impacts. Using uniquely detailed interregional trade data on goods and services for the EU, we apply a novel methodology that disentangles region-sector sensitivities (elasticities) of firms' competitive positions to (non)tariff barriers from the implications of different post-Brexit UK-EU trade scenarios. This enables us to derive the economic geography of competitive opportunities and vulnerabilities of Brexit of firms, along with the degree of uncertainty that surrounds these effects, independently from scenarios. Our analysis demonstrates that the adverse international competitive vulnerabilities of UK regions are much larger than those of the rest of the EU due to the dependency of the UK on the EU via global value chains. The impact on the competitive positions of firms means that within the UK, Brexit is likely to increase interregional inequalities. In contrast, interregional inequalities across Europe may actually fall, depending on the nature of the post-Brexit UK-EU trading arrangements. Moreover, the key political focus on the nature of the post-Brexit arrangements appears to be misplaced in that most UK regions are rather insensitive to the specific nature of the deal. As such, the economic geography implications of Brexit appear to be largely unrelated to UK domestic political narratives.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 421
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early Lessons from the EU/UK Brexit Negotiations: Implications for Ireland
    MacMaolain, Caoimhin
    [J]. EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW, 2021, 27 (04): : 629 - 652
  • [2] The (potential) impact of Brexit on UK SMEs: regional evidence and public policy implications
    Brown, Ross
    Linares-Zegarra, Jose
    Wilson, John O. S.
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2019, 53 (05) : 761 - 770
  • [3] The impact of brexit on regional productivity in the UK
    Fingleton, Bernard
    Gardiner, Ben
    Martin, Ron
    Barbieri, Luca
    [J]. ZFW-ADVANCES IN ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 67 (02): : 142 - 160
  • [4] The UK and the EU Arbitration Convention after Brexit
    Bane, Rhys
    Geursen, Wessel
    [J]. EC TAX REVIEW, 2024, 33 (02): : 58 - 67
  • [5] Potential impact of Brexit outside the UK/EU
    Ranson, Paul
    [J]. European Pharmaceutical Review, 2019, 24 (02): : 30 - 32
  • [6] Brexit and the Provision of Financial Services into the EU and into the UK
    Wymeersch, Eddy
    [J]. EUROPEAN COMPANY AND FINANCIAL LAW REVIEW, 2018, 15 (04): : 732 - 771
  • [7] UK and EU Company Law after Brexit
    Knapp, Vanessa
    [J]. EUROPEAN COMPANY AND FINANCIAL LAW REVIEW, 2020, 17 (02) : 184 - 199
  • [8] The implications of the Brexit from EU and bitcoin
    Al-Tawil, Tareq Na'el
    Younies, Hassan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL, 2021, 24 (01): : 137 - 149
  • [9] The impact of EU Objective 1 funds on regional development: Evidence from the UK and the prospect of Brexit
    Di Cataldo, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (05) : 814 - 839
  • [10] Brexit implications for sustainable energy in the UK
    Kuzemko, Caroline
    Blondeel, Mathieu
    Froggatt, Antony
    [J]. POLICY AND POLITICS, 2022, 50 (04): : 548 - 567