Association Between Older Age and Increasing Gleason Score

被引:22
|
作者
Muralidhar, Vinayak [1 ]
Ziehr, David R. [2 ]
Mahal, Brandon A. [2 ]
Chen, Yu-Wei [3 ]
Nezolosky, Michelle D. [4 ,5 ]
Viswanathan, Vidya B. [4 ,5 ]
Choueiri, Toni K. [6 ,7 ]
Sweeney, Christopher J. [6 ,7 ]
Quoc-Dien Trinh [8 ]
Nguyen, Paul L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Harvard Mit Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[4] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Urol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Age groups; Cancer screening; Gleason score; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; TASK-FORCE RECOMMENDATION; PROSTATE-CANCER MORTALITY; STAGE T1C; GRADE; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; DEDIFFERENTIATION; CARCINOMA; GUIDELINE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2015.05.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There are few data about the risks versus benefits of screening older men for prostate cancer. Using a large national database, we found that older men diagnosed with prostate cancer have a higher probability of harboring high-risk or high-grade disease. These data could be used to help counsel healthy older men about the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening. Introduction: In order to help inform the discussion about the risks versus benefits of prostate cancer screening among older men, we determined whether advanced age is associated with a higher probability of harboring high-grade or high-rik disease. Patients and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 383,039 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2004-2011. The percentage of patients diagnosed with low-, intermediate-, or high-risk disease or a Gleason score of 6, 7, or 8 to 10 was calculated by age range. As a secondary analysis, we examined whether this relationship was different in 2010-2011 versus 2007-2008 (before and after the 2009 publication of screening trials). Results: The probability of Gleason score 8 to 10 or high-risk disease increased significantly with increasing age. The percentage of Gleason score 8 to 10 disease among men ages 50 to 54, 70 to 74, and 80 to 84 years was 8.9%, 16.2%, and 28.5%, respectively, and the percentage of high-risk disease was 14.3%, 22.4%, and 38.7% (P<.001). There were similar relationships among men with stage T1c disease. In addition, older men experienced a significant increase in the relative probability of high-risk or high-grade disease from 2007-2008 to 2010-2011. Conclusion: In this large US-based cohort, older men had a much higher probability of high-grade or high-risk prostate cancer. Physicians and patients should take into account the higher risk of more aggressive or advanced disease in older men when discussing the risks and benefits of prostate-specific antigen screening with healthy older men with a substantial life expectancy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 530
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Older Age and Increasing Gleason Score: Implications for Prostate Cancer Screening
    Muralidhar, V.
    Ziehr, D. R.
    Mahal, B. A.
    Chen, Y. W.
    Nezolosky, M. D.
    Viswanathan, V. B.
    Choueiri, T. K.
    Sweeney, C. J.
    Trinh, Q. D.
    Nguyen, P. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E199 - E199
  • [2] Is There a Correlation between Age and Gleason Score: A Single Institution Experience
    Bhuvanagiri, A.
    Cheah, W. P. F.
    Kailasa, A. Kumar
    Thangavelu, M.
    Alexandrou, K.
    Kannan, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 216 - 216
  • [3] Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading
    Gershman, Boris
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Olumi, Aria F.
    Young, Robert H.
    McDougal, W. Scott
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (07) : 1033 - 1037
  • [4] Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the concordance of biopsy Gleason score to prostatectomy Gleason score
    Coogan, CL
    Latchamsetty, KC
    Greenfield, J
    Corman, JM
    Lynch, B
    Porter, CR
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (03) : 324 - 327
  • [5] Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the accuracy of the Gleason score when compared to radical prostatectomy Gleason score
    Coogan, CL
    Latchamsetty, KC
    Greenfield, J
    Corman, JM
    Porter, CR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 479 - 479
  • [6] Discrepancies Between Biopsy Gleason Score and Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Gleason Score: An Iranian Experience
    Dolatkhah, Shahaboddin
    Mirtalebi, Maryam
    Daneshpajouhnejad, Parnaz
    Barahimi, Ahmadreza
    Mazdak, Hamid
    Izadpanahi, Mohammad Hossein
    Mohammadi, Mehrdad
    Taheri, Diana
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [7] Association between the dihydrotestosterone level in the prostate and prostate cancer aggressiveness using the gleason score
    Nishiyama, Tsutomu
    Ikarashi, Toshihiko
    Hashimoto, Yutaka
    Suzuki, Kazuya
    Takahashi, Kota
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (04): : 1387 - 1391
  • [8] OLDER AGE PREDICTS GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING DURING LONG-TERM MONITORING ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Tosoian, Jeffrey
    Srivastava, Amar
    Kates, Max
    Landis, Patricia
    Epstein, Jonathan
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Trock, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E102 - E102
  • [9] Association between the dihydrotestosterone level in the prostate and prostate cancer aggressiveness using the Gleason score
    Nishiyama, T
    Ikarashi, T
    Hashimoto, Y
    Suzuki, K
    Takahashi, K
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 136 - 136
  • [10] THE EFFECT OF AGE AND PROSTATE SIZE ON GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING
    Gershman, Boris
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    McDougal, W. Scott
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E80 - E80