Balancing the production line using the ergonomic approach

被引:0
|
作者
Ginting, Rosnani [1 ]
Khatami, Muhammad [1 ]
Malik, Alfin Fauzi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sumatera Utara, Dept Ind Engn, Medan 20155, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1757-899X/801/1/012107
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Track balance is a process of balancing production lines at a series of work stations (machinery and equipment) that need to be carried out in the product manufacturing process. This aims of this research is to form and balance the work risks allocated to each work station. If the track balance is not carried out it can lead to inefficiencies and reduce the level of flexibility of the production floor. Job Rotation (JR) is a method for designing jobs where staff learn work skills from various parts and by making changes to tasks, fatigue resulting from repetitive work tasks will be eliminated. In principle, the Region Approach method seeks to charge first to operations that have a large preliminary responsibility. Through the research conducted, the optimum trajectory is obtained using the region approach and job rotation methods where the method can produce optimum work center and can reduce the risk of excessive work. Region approach trajectory, as many as 7 work stations. In addition, the efficiency of the production line where there is an increase in efficiency of 10.56% in the region approach trajectory. Then the balance delay decreased by 10.07% in the region approach trajectory, and a decrease in the smoothing index by 298.90 in the region approach trajectory. Based on the results of the calculation of work risk using the RULA method, the results of the calculation of work risk on the work elements of each work center where the results obtained by the reduction of work elements and the addition of work elements are carried out so that the work risks at each work center are balanced, and can reduce injuries when work. Production line on the proposed condition with a cycle time of 2304 seconds and there are 7 work stations. The known value of balance delay is 18.62%, efficiency is 81.76% and smoothing index is 2015.74.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ERGONOMIC ASSEMBLY LINE BALANCING
    Baykasoglu, Adil
    Demirkol Akyol, Sebnem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2014, 29 (04): : 785 - 792
  • [2] Ergonomic assembly line balancing
    Ergonomik Montaj Hatti dengeleme
    [J]. 1600, Gazi Universitesi (29):
  • [3] Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing
    Otto, Alena
    Scholl, Armin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 212 (02) : 277 - 286
  • [4] Optimizing ergonomic in manual assembly line balancing problem
    Tkitek, Zainab
    Triki, Hager
    [J]. 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AID SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS (DASA), 2022, : 842 - 845
  • [5] PRODUCTION LINE BALANCING
    VEJMOLA, S
    [J]. EKONOMICKO-MATEMATICKY OBZOR, 1976, 12 (04): : 403 - 427
  • [6] Analysis of production line balancing using genetic algorithms
    Ginting, Rosnani
    Indi, Benedictus Vito Bayu Aji
    Malik, Alfin Fauzi
    [J]. 2ND TALENTA CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 801
  • [7] An exact method to incorporate ergonomic risks in Assembly Line Balancing Problems
    Possan Junior, Moacyr Carlos
    Michels, Adalberto Sato
    Magatao, Leandro
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 183
  • [8] Improvement in production line efficiency of hemming unit using line balancing techniques
    Kumar, R. Nithish
    Mohan, R.
    Gobinath, N.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 46 : 1459 - 1463
  • [9] Ergonomic assessment of a workstation in a paints production line
    Monteiro, J. M.
    Calvao, J. C. A.
    Monteiro, J. M.
    Pinho, M. E.
    Vaz, M. A. P.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE II, 2014, : 193 - 197
  • [10] Models for assembly line balancing by temporal, spatial and ergonomic risk attributes
    Bautista, Joaquin
    Batalla-Garcia, Cristina
    Alfaro-Pozo, Rocio
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 251 (03) : 814 - 829