What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously?: Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants

被引:74
|
作者
McCormick-Huhn, Kaitlin [1 ]
Warner, Leah R. [2 ]
Settles, Isis H. [3 ,4 ]
Shields, Stephanie A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, William S Boyd Sch Law, 4505 S Maryland Pkwy,Box 451003, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Ramapo Coll, Sch Social Sci & Human Serv, Mahwah, NJ USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Afroamer & African Studies, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
intersectionality; social group membership; research participants; psychology; power; INVITED REFLECTION INTERSECTIONALITY; PERCEIVED DISCRIMINATION; SOCIAL-JUSTICE; GENDER; IDENTITY; RACE; WOMEN; MEN; INVISIBILITY; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1177/0361684319866430
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Using intersectionality to change how psychologists think about the demographic profile of their participants is one readily available change that psychologists across the discipline can implement to improve psychological science. In this article, we aim to provide a guide for psychologists who are not already engaged with feminist practices and/or are unsure of how an intersectional approach to participants applies to their research. We argue that by engaging with four perspective shifts of intersectional thinking: multidimensionality, dynamic construction, structural power, and outcomes of systemic disadvantage and advantage, psychologists can more accurately represent the "person" that psychology, as a discipline, seeks to understand. We suggest changes at the researcher, journal, and grant-making agency levels to support an intersectional reconceptualization of participants. As psychology continues to change, in order to foster reproducible science practices and research with relevance to real-world problems, there is opportunity to promote discipline-level change that would take intersectionality seriously.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 456
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条