The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A Meta-Analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Nikas, Ilias P. [1 ]
Seide, Svenja [2 ]
Proctor, Tanja [2 ]
Kleinaki, Zoi [1 ,3 ]
Kleinaki, Maria [1 ]
Reynolds, Jordan P. [4 ]
机构
[1] European Univ Cyprus, Sch Med, CY-2404 Nicosia, Cyprus
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Gen Hosp Nikea, Internal Med Dept, Athens 18454, Greece
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Jacksonville, FL 32256 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
bladder cancer; urothelial carcinoma; urothelial neoplasia; cytopathology; urine; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity and specificity; risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM); tumor; pathology; GRADE UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE; BLADDER-CANCER; SPECIMENS; CELLS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/jpm12020170
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology is a standardized, evidence-based reporting system, comprising seven diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), HGUC, low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), and other malignancies. This study aimed to calculate the pooled risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) of each category and demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology reported with TPS. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, while data were extracted and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The pooled ROHM was 17.70% for the nondiagnostic category (95% CI, 0.0650; 0.3997), 13.04% for the NHGUC (95% CI, 0.0932; 0.1796), 38.65% for the AUC (95% CI, 0.3042; 0.4759), 12.45% for the LGUN (95% CI, 0.0431; 0.3101), 76.89 for the SHGUC (95% CI, 0.7063; 0.8216), and 91.79% for the HGUC and other malignancies (95% CI, 0.8722; 0.9482). A summary ROC curve was created and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.849, while the pooled sensitivity was 0.669 (95% CI, 0.589; 0.741) and false-positive rate was 0.101 (95% CI, 0.063; 0.158). In addition, the pooled DOR of the included studies was 21.258 (95% CI, 14.336; 31.522). TPS assigns each sample into a diagnostic category linked with a specific ROHM, guiding clinical management.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is the Paris System Sufficient for Reporting Urinary Cytology?
    Ozekinci, Selver
    Erdem, Zeynep Betul
    Yildiz, Fetin Rustu
    [J]. ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOPATHOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 42 (04): : 105 - 111
  • [2] A review of the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology
    VandenBussche, C. J.
    [J]. CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 27 (03) : 153 - 156
  • [3] Urinary cytology and the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology: Implications for urological management
    Gupta, M.
    VandenBussche, C. J.
    Bivalacqua, T. J.
    [J]. CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 29 (04) : 368 - 370
  • [4] The Paris system of Reporting Urinary Cytology: Strengths and opportunities
    Kurtycz, Daniel F. I.
    Sundling, Kaitlin E.
    Barkan, Guliz A.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 48 (10) : 890 - 895
  • [5] Interobserver Reproducibility of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology
    Layfield, Lester
    Long, Theresa
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    Esebua, Magda
    Frazier, Shellaine R.
    Giorgadze, Tamar
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 236A - 237A
  • [6] Interobserver reproducibility of the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology
    Long, Theresa
    Layfield, Lester J.
    Esebua, Magda
    Frazier, Shellaine R.
    Giorgadze, D. Tamar
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    [J]. CYTOJOURNAL, 2017, 14
  • [7] Interobserver Reproducibility of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology
    Layfield, Lester
    Long, Theresa
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    Esebua, Magda
    Frazier, Shellaine R.
    Giorgadze, Tamar
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 236A - 237A
  • [8] Application of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology at a tertiary hospital
    Pereira, Anabela
    Almeida, Rui
    Oliveira, Rui Caetano
    Sousa, Vitor
    Tavares-Silva, Edgar
    Figueiredo, Arnaldo
    Fernandes, Graca
    Cipriano, Maria Augusta
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (23)
  • [9] A new terminology for urinary cytopathology: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (2015)
    Courtade-Saidi, Monique
    Cochand-Priollet, Beatrix
    Vielh, Philippe
    Piatond, Eric
    [J]. ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2019, 39 (05) : 344 - 351
  • [10] Practice Patterns in Urinary Cytopathology Prior to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology
    Barkan, Guliz A.
    Tabatabai, Z. Laura
    Kurtycz, Daniel F., I
    Padmanabhan, Vijayalakshmi
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Nayar, Ritu
    Sturgis, Charles D.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 144 (02) : 172 - 176