Complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity: Implications for European Union energy governance

被引:34
|
作者
Kovacic, Zora [1 ]
Jane Di Felice, Louisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Ctr Study Sci & Humanities SVT, Parkveien 9, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Ciencia & Tecnol Ambientals, Edifici Z,Campus UAB, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Science-policy interface; Policy-making; Indicators; Definition; Energy security; UK POLICY; SECURITY; SCIENCE; PERSPECTIVES; INDICATORS; CONTROVERSY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy security is an ambiguous concept. Growing academic interest has aimed at defining, conceptualising and measuring energy security, often through indicators. Energy policy in the European Union (EU) is not concerned with energy security's ambiguous conceptualisation, nor does it use energy security indicators, but it refers consistently to security as one of its primary aims. In this paper, by analysing the use of energy security both in scientific publications and in EU policy, we argue that the ambiguity of the concept plays a function in the policy process and is only seen as a problem in the academic literature. Building on the uncertainty literature, we conceptualise ambiguity as the type of uncertainty that emerges from complexity. Complexity leads to the existence of multiple representations of a system, which may serve different purposes in the policy process, generating ambiguity. Uncertainty is mobilised to frame energy policy as a matter of security. This has implications for the science-policy interface: on one hand, the analysis suggests that science's aim of providing holistic assessments and clarifications may not serve its desired instrumental purpose in policymaking; on the other, ambiguity allows for materially ineffective policy measures to persist in the name of energy security.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 169
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis
    Ortwin Renn
    Andreas Klinke
    Marjolein van Asselt
    [J]. AMBIO, 2011, 40 : 231 - 246
  • [2] Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis
    Renn, Ortwin
    Klinke, Andreas
    van Asselt, Marjolein
    [J]. AMBIO, 2011, 40 (02) : 231 - 246
  • [3] 'Harder' soft governance in the European Energy Union
    Knodt, Michele
    Ringel, Marc
    Mueller, Rainer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2020, 22 (06) : 761 - 774
  • [4] The European Union and the good governance of energy resources
    Escribano Frances, Gonzalo
    Martin Gonzalez, Enrique San
    [J]. REVISTA CIDOB D AFERS INTERNATIONALS, 2014, (108): : 95 - 118
  • [5] The Governance System of the European Energy Union and Climate Action
    Schlacke, Sabine
    Knodt, Michele
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL & PLANNING LAW, 2019, 16 (04) : 323 - 339
  • [6] The European union and governance
    Schrauwen, A
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2004, 41 (06): : 1738 - 1740
  • [7] On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management
    Pich, MT
    Loch, CH
    De Meyer, A
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (08) : 1008 - 1023
  • [8] Experimentalism in European Union and global financial governance: interactions, contrasts, and implications
    Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm
    Porter, Tony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 21 (03) : 408 - 429
  • [9] THE LEVEL OF GOVERNANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Vrnakova, Irena
    [J]. POLITICKE VEDY, 2018, 21 (04): : 140 - 161
  • [10] The European Union and Global Governance
    Buhari-Gulmez, Didem
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2010, 8 (03) : 433 - 433