On the importance of kin relations to Canadian women and men

被引:28
|
作者
Salmon, CA
Daly, M
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton
来源
ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY | 1996年 / 17卷 / 05期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
close relationships; family relations; genealogical knowledge; kinship; self-concept; sex differences; sibling relations;
D O I
10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00046-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Sex differences in the salience and meaning of kin relations for contemporary Canadians were examined in two studies. In study 1, 24 opposite-sex adult sibling pairs were asked to reconstruct their kindreds as fully as possible, following a computerized menu. Sisters almost invariably recalled more relatives than did their brothers, especially living and matrilateral relatives. In study 2, a questionnaire administered to 150 female and 150 male undergraduates explored the relevance of kinship to characterizations of the self (''Who are you?'') and to nominations of one's closest social relationships. Women were much more likely than men to refer to their kinship statuses in characterizing themselves (I am a daughter, a sister, etc.), whereas 28% of men and only 8% of women mentioned their surnames (I am a Smith, Jones, etc.). Women and men were about equally likely to name a relative, as opposed to a mate or friend, as the person to whom they feel closest, but women more often nominated a parent (especially mother) and men a sibling (especially an older sister). These sex differences are discussed in relation to possible differences in how women and men make use of family ties. (C) Elsevier Science Inc., 1996
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 297
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOMATOTYPES OF CANADIAN MEN AND WOMEN
    BAILEY, DA
    CARTER, JEL
    MIRWALD, RL
    [J]. HUMAN BIOLOGY, 1982, 54 (04) : 813 - 828
  • [2] No Evidence for Treating Friends' Children Like Kin in Canadian Androphilic Men
    Abild, Miranda L.
    VanderLaan, Doug P.
    Vasey, Paul L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2013, 50 (07) : 697 - 703
  • [3] MEN AND WOMEN, THEIR DIFFERENCE AND ITS IMPORTANCE
    DEMARCO, D
    [J]. THOUGHT-A REVIEW OF CULTURE AND IDEA, 1981, 56 (223): : 449 - 462
  • [4] On the ontology of men and women relations in Christianity
    Kasatkina, Tatyana
    [J]. NOVYI MIR, 2008, (09): : 142 - 153
  • [5] COMPLEXITY OF RELATIONS BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN
    Benchehida, A.
    [J]. EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 7896 - 7896
  • [6] Women and Men as Managers: The Importance of Disappointment
    Chandler, John
    [J]. GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION, 2010, 17 (05): : 590 - 611
  • [7] PROFILE - WOMEN IN CANADIAN PUBLIC-RELATIONS
    SCRIMGER, J
    [J]. PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 1985, 11 (03) : 40 - 46
  • [8] WOMEN HAVE NO AFFINES AND MEN NO KIN - THE POLITICS OF THE JIVAROAN GENDER RELATION
    SEYMOURSMITH, C
    [J]. MAN, 1991, 26 (04): : 629 - 649
  • [9] Nitrates and BMD among Canadian men and women
    Jamal, S. A.
    Goltzman, D.
    Hanley, D. A.
    Papaioannou, A.
    Prior, J. C.
    Josse, R. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 : S74 - S74
  • [10] The importance of genetic parenthood for infertile men and women
    Hendriks, S.
    Peeraer, K.
    Bos, H.
    Repping, S.
    Dancet, E. A. F.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (10) : 2076 - 2087