Luteal phase support with progesterone in intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized study

被引:22
|
作者
Romero Nieto, Maria Inmaculada [1 ]
Lorente Gonzalez, Juan [1 ]
Eduardo Arjona-Berral, Jose [1 ]
del Munoz-Villanueva, Maria [1 ]
Castelo-Branco, Camil [2 ]
机构
[1] Reina Sofia Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cordoba, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Fac Med, Inst Clin Gynecol Obstet & Neonatol, Hosp Clin,Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer I, Barcelona 7, Spain
关键词
Infertility; intrauterine insemination; livebirth rate; luteal support; ovulation induction; pregnancy rate; progesterone; PREGNANCY RATES; OVARIAN STIMULATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; CYCLES; GONADOTROPIN; INFERTILITY; IVF;
D O I
10.3109/09513590.2013.859242
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the effect of vaginal progesterone as luteal support on pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients who undergo ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination (IUI). Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patient(s): About 398 patients with primary infertility were treated during 893 ovarian stimulation and IUI cycles from February 2010 to September 2012. Methods: All patients underwent ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins combined with IUI. Patients in the supported group received vaginal micronized progesterone capsules 200 mg once daily from the day after insemination until next menstruation or continuing for up to 8 weeks of pregnancy. Women allocated in the control group did not receive luteal phase support. Main outcome measure(s): Livebirth rate, clinical pregnancy rate and early miscarriage rate per cycle. Result(s): Of the 893 cycles, a total of 111 clinical pregnancies occurred. There were no significant differences between supported with progesterone and unsupported cycle in terms of livebirth rate (10.2% versus 8.3%, respectively, with a p value = 0.874) and clinical pregnancy rate (13.8% compared with 11.0% in unsupported cycle with a p value = 0.248). An early miscarriage rate of 3.6% was observed in the supported cycles and 2.7% in the unsupported cycles, with no significant differences between the groups (p value = 0.874). Conclusion(s): In infertile patients treated with mildly ovarian stimulation with recombinant gonadotropins and IUI, luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone is not associated with higher livebirth rate or clinical pregnancy rate compared with patients who did not receive any luteal phase support.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 201
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT IN INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION CYCLES: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY.
    An, S. J.
    Jung, J. Y.
    Kwon, H. C.
    Kim, H. M.
    Han, J. H.
    Lee, S. J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S176 - S177
  • [2] Effect of Luteal Phase Support with Vaginal Progesterone in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles with Regard to Follicular Response A Prospective Randomized Study
    Seckin, Berna
    Turkcapar, Figen
    Yildiz, Yunus
    Senturk, Bahar
    Yilmaz, Nafiye
    Gulerman, Cavidan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 59 (5-6) : 260 - 266
  • [3] Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study
    Erdem, Ahmet
    Erdem, Mehmet
    Atmaca, Songuel
    Guler, Ismail
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (06) : 2508 - 2513
  • [4] Luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study of 300 mg versus 600 mg intravaginal progesterone tablet
    Biberoglu, Ebru H.
    Tanrikulu, Filiz
    Erdem, Mehmet
    Erdem, Ahmet
    Biberoglu, Kutay Omer
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (01) : 55 - 57
  • [5] Luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination cycles
    Gun, Ismet
    Ozdamar, Ozkan
    Yilmaz, Ali
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 13 (02) : 90 - 94
  • [6] Comparison of oral dydrogesterone and vaginal micronized progesterone for luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination
    Tas, Mustafa
    Uludag, Semih Zeki
    Aygen, Mustafa Ercan
    Sahin, Yilmaz
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 36 (01) : 77 - 80
  • [7] The impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles; A prospective randomised study
    Atmaca, S.
    Erdem, M.
    Erdem, A.
    Guler, I.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S163 - S163
  • [8] Impact of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone on the clinical pregnancy rate in intrauterine insemination cycles stimulated with gonadotropins: a randomized multicenter study
    Peeraer, Karen
    D'Hooghe, Thomas
    Laurent, Pascale
    Pelckmans, Sofie
    Delvigne, Annick
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Welkenhuysen, Myriam
    Wyns, Christine
    De Neubourg, Diane
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (06) : 1490 - 1495
  • [9] Subcutaneous aqueous versus vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination cycles: a pilot randomized, controlled trial
    Venturella, R.
    Mocciaro, R.
    Lico, D.
    Rocca, M.
    Di Cello, A.
    Piccione, F.
    D'Alessandro, P.
    Morelli, M.
    Zullo, F.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 304 - 305
  • [10] Progesterone Supplement and Luteal Phase Deficiency in Unifollicular Intrauterine Insemination Cycles
    Bakay, Kadir
    Aytekin, Fatih
    Celik, Nilufer Yigit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 6 (06) : 691 - 693