An Investigation of Agreement Between the Item Difficulty Coefficient Calculated in Accordance With Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory With Bland-Altman Method

被引:0
|
作者
Acar, Tulin [1 ]
机构
[1] Parantez Educ Res Consultancy Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Bland-Altman method; Classical test theory; Item difficulty coefficient; Item response theory;
D O I
10.1080/03610926.2013.793353
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to investigate agreement between item difficulty coefficients calculated relying on classical test theory and item response theory with Bland-Altman method. According to results, although there is a high correlation between Pj and b coefficient estimated with HGLM (hierarchical generalized linear model), 1P, and 3P models, it can be said that there is no agreement between two methods and cannot be used interchangeably. It is observed that the confidence limit is wide according to Bland-Altman graphics. Therefore, it can be said that there is no agreement between item difficulty values obtained from two methods. Bland-Altman method which is used in clinical studies mostly is suggested to be used in the comparison of methods used especially in the evaluation of student performance in education, in agreement studies among specialist considerations especially in terms of providing additional information to the studies in which correlation coefficient is calculated.
引用
收藏
页码:4614 / 4621
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Relation of Item Difficulty Between Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory: Computerized Adaptive Test Perspective
    Aybek, Eren Can
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2023, 14 (02): : 118 - 127
  • [2] Item Analysis of Test of Proficiency in Korean: Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory
    Yu, Minae
    Kim, Hyunah
    KOREAN LANGUAGE IN AMERICA, 2019, 23 (01): : 1 - 26
  • [3] TEST THEORIES: CLASSICAL THEORY AND ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
    Muniz, Jose
    PAPELES DEL PSICOLOGO, 2010, 31 (01): : 57 - 66
  • [4] Item response theory and classical test theory: An empirical comparison of their item/person statistics
    Fan, XT
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1998, 58 (03) : 357 - 381
  • [5] A empirical comparation between item response theory and classical test theory models
    Rojas, ANH
    Jiménez, H
    Sánchez, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 194 - 194
  • [6] Using classical test theory in combination with item response theory
    Bechger, TM
    Maris, G
    Verstralen, HHFM
    Béguin, AA
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 27 (05) : 319 - 334
  • [7] Item analysis of the Child Neuropsychological Assessment Test (TENI): Classical test theory and item response theory
    Martins, Pedro S. R.
    Barbosa-Pereira, Drielle
    Valgas-Costa, Marli
    Mansur-Alves, Marcela
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-CHILD, 2022, 11 (03) : 339 - 349
  • [8] Empirical relationships between classical test theory and item response theory statistics.
    García, MIB
    Marañón, PP
    Falcón, JCS
    Costas, CS
    PSICOTHEMA, 2001, 13 (02) : 324 - 329
  • [9] Advances in Psychometrics: From Classical Test Theory to Item Response Theory
    Andreoli Sartes, Laisa Marcorela
    Oliveira de Souza-Formigoni, Maria Lucia
    PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA, 2013, 26 (02): : 241 - 250
  • [10] Missing item responses in latent growth analysis: Item response theory versus classical test theory
    Gorter, R.
    Fox, J-P
    Eekhout, I
    Heymans, M. W.
    Twisk, J. W. R.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (04) : 996 - 1014