Cultural adaptation and validation of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in nursing students in Spain

被引:12
|
作者
Roman-Cereto, Montserrat [1 ,2 ]
Garcia-Mayor, Silvia [2 ]
Kaknani-Uttumchandani, Shakira [2 ]
Garcia-Gamez, Marina [2 ]
Leon-Campos, Alvaro [2 ]
Fernandez-Ordonez, Eloisa [2 ]
Luisa Ruiz-Garcia, Maria [2 ]
Marti-Garcia, C. [2 ]
Lopez-Leiva, Inmaculada [2 ]
Lasater, Kathie [3 ]
Miguel Morales-Asencio, Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Dist Primary Hlth Care Malaga, Primary Hlth Care Ctr Victoria, Malaga, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, Dept Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Malaga, Spain
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Nursing, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
Simulation training; Patient simulation; Education; nursing; Students; Clinical competence; Educational measurement; Psychometrics; PATIENT SIMULATION; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; EDUCATION; THINKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The clinical judgment and decision-making abilities of nurses can influence many health outcomes, hence the importance of addressing these qualities in university studies. In this respect, clinical simulation is a commonly employed teaching method. The evaluation of simulation activities requires standardised instruments, such as the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric, which is widely used for this purpose, although a culturally adapted and validated version in Spain is not available. Aims: To obtain a Spanish culturally adapted and validated version of the rubric for undergraduate students of nursing. Design, Participants and Setting: Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation study carried out with undergraduate nursing students in the simulation laboratories at the University of Malaga (Spain). Methods: A process of translation/back-translation and cultural adaptation was carried out in accordance with international standards. The rubric was empirically evaluated in standardised scenarios with high and medium fidelity simulators. Each student took part in two different simulation sessions, led by two instructors. In each simulation, the data were collected by two independent observers. Results: 152 observations were obtained from 76 students. The interobserver reliability was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.95) (p = 0.0001) and Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, the fit of the model was satisfactory in all indices, with a chi(2)/df value of 1.08, GFI 0.96, TLI 0.99, NFI 0.97 and RMSEA 0.24 (90% CI 0.000-0.066). Conclusions: The rubric obtained is culturally adapted to the Spanish educational context, and is valid and reliable for nursing students. Further prospective studies should be undertaken to evaluate the responsiveness, potential for transfer to clinical practice and cost-benefit ratios of different simulation designs.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcultural Translation and Validation of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric©
    Duarte, Hugo Miguel Santos
    Lasater, Kathie
    Dixe, Maria dos Anjos Coelho Rodrigues
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2022, 75 (06)
  • [2] The Korean version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: A validation study
    Shin, Hyunsook
    Park, Chang Gi
    Shim, Kaka
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2015, 35 (01) : 68 - 72
  • [3] Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese
    Fen Yang
    Yuncui Wang
    Chongming Yang
    M Huifang Zhou
    Jing Shu
    Bei Fu
    Hui Hu
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 19
  • [4] Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese
    Yang, Fen
    Wang, Yuncui
    Yang, Chongming
    Zhou, M. Huifang
    Shu, Jing
    Fu, Bei
    Hu, Hui
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [5] The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: 17 Years Later
    Lasater, Kathie
    Nielsen, Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2024, 63 (03) : 149 - 155
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric - Brazilian Version
    Ramalho Vasconcelos Morais, Sheila Coelho
    Perbone Nunes, Janaina Gomes
    Lasater, Kathie
    Bottura Leite de Barros, Alba Lucia
    de Carvalho, Emilia Campos
    [J]. ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 31 (03) : 265 - 271
  • [7] Psychometric Properties of The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) presented by
    Cantrell, Mary Ann
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 70 (03) : E66 - E67
  • [8] The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: Implications for Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness
    Lee, Kristin C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2021, 60 (02) : 67 - +
  • [9] The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric as a Framework to Enhance Clinical Judgment in Novice and Experienced Nurses
    Miraglia, Robbin
    Asselin, Marilyn E.
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 31 (05) : 284 - 291
  • [10] Simulation Evaluation Using a Modified Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric
    Ashcraft, Alyce S.
    Opton, Laura
    Bridges, Ruth Ann
    Caballero, Sandra
    Veesart, Amanda
    Weaver, Christy
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 34 (02) : 122 - 126