Reliability and validation of Turkish version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Alhomedha, Ghofran [1 ]
Citaker, Seyit [2 ]
Gunaydin, Gurkan [3 ]
Khan, Furqan [4 ]
Sezer, Refia [5 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Inst Hlth Sci, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Fac Hlth Sci, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Adnan Menderes Univ, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Fac Hlth Sci, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Orthoped Surg, Tehran, Iran
[5] Izzet Baysal Training & Res Hosp, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Bolu, Turkey
关键词
Dallas Pain Questionnaire; low back pain; reliability; Turkish version; validity; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DISABILITY SCALE; INDIVIDUALS; VALIDITY; INDEX;
D O I
10.14744/agri.2021.24861
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Evaluation of low back pain (LBP) requires a condition specific disability questionnaire along with pain and satisfaction measure such as self-assessment pain scales. Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) is a 16-item visual analog scale, developed for evaluating patient's cognitions about the percentage that chronic pain affects four aspects of the subject's lives. It's easy to understand; can be answered in 3-5 min and can be scored in <1 min. This reliability and validation study offers health-care providers an opportunity to utilize this distinct questionnaire in Turkish population with back pain.The objectives are translation of Dallas questionnaire from English to Turkish language and to perform validation and reliability study. Methods: A total of 102 patients (79 women and 23 men) with mean age of 50.2 years and LBP for at least 3 months answered DPQ along with five other previously translated and validated questionnaires in Turkish language. Fifty-nine of these patients participated retest reliability after 7 days. Internal consistency and test-retest analyzes were conducted to determine the reliability and convergent validity was evaluated for the validation study. Results:The questionnaire was noted to have high internal consistency. The test-retest analysis revealed an excellent correlation (ICC=0.969). Pearson correlation coefficient shows that all subscales (sections) of DPQ are significant and comparable with each of the other questionnaires included in this study proving that it has sufficient convergent validity (p<0.001). Conclusion:The Turkish version of DPQ is content, valid, and reliable. DPQ is sensitive to use in patients with LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Tunisian version of the Dallas pain questionnaire
    Bejia, I
    Zrour, S
    Touzi, M
    Bergaoui, N
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 534 - 534
  • [2] Turkish McGill pain questionnaire: Reliability and validation
    Oksuz, E.
    Malhan, S.
    Tulunay, F. C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A467 - A467
  • [3] Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire and Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire-Short Form: Translation, Reliability, and Validation Study of the Turkish Version
    Yurdakul, Ozan Volkan
    Rezvani, Aylin
    Kucukakkas, Okan
    Tolu, Sena
    Kilicoglu, Mehmet Serkan
    Aydin, Teoman
    [J]. TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 29 (05) : 683 - 688
  • [4] Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire in patients with low back pain
    Korkmaz, N.
    Akinci, A.
    Yorukan, S.
    Surucu, H. Selcuk
    Saracbasi, O.
    Ozcakar, L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 45 (04) : 527 - 535
  • [5] Validation of the Turkish version of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in patients with chronic pain
    Inal, Ferda Yilmaz
    Gul, Kursat
    Yilmaz Camgoz, Yadigar
    Daskaya, Hayrettin
    Kocoglu, Hasan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (12)
  • [6] Validation of the French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients
    Marty, M
    Blotman, F
    Avouac, B
    Rozenberg, S
    Valat, JP
    [J]. REVUE DU RHUMATISME, 1998, 65 (02): : 126 - 134
  • [7] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE PELVIC PAIN IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE
    Kurt, Tugce Keziban
    Taspinar, Betul
    Taspinar, Ferruh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 7 (02): : 705 - 712
  • [8] Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Identification Pain Questionnaire in the Assessment of Neuropathic Pain
    Uzunkulaoglu, Aslihan
    Kerim, Duygu
    Ay, Saime
    Ergin, Sureyya
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [9] The prosthesis evaluation questionnaire: reliability and cross-validation of the Turkish version
    Safer, Vildan Binay
    Yavuzer, Gunes
    Demir, Sibel Ozbudak
    Yanikoglu, Inci
    Guneri, Fulya Demircioglu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2015, 27 (06) : 1677 - 1680
  • [10] Reliability and Validation of Turkish Version of the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire
    Gundogmus, Ibrahim
    Unsal, Cansu
    Alma, Leyla
    Kul, Aysegul Tasdelen
    Aydin, Mehmet Sinan
    Bolu, Abdullah
    Oznur, Taner
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (04): : 235 - 242