What really matters? A mixed methods study of treatment preferences and priorities among people with epilepsy in the UK

被引:7
|
作者
Ring, Adele [1 ]
Jacoby, Ann [1 ]
Baker, Gus [2 ]
Holmes, Emily [3 ]
Hughes, Dyfrig [3 ]
Kierans, Ciara [1 ]
Marson, Anthony [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Publ Hlth & Policy, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Mol & Clin Pharmacol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Bangor Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Med Evaluat, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient preferences; Life context; Antiepileptic drugs; Surgery; Psychological/neuropsychological treatments; Complementary therapies; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; DISTANCE DELIVERY; SELF-MANAGEMENT; KETOGENIC DIET; DEPRESSION; SEIZURE; OUTCOMES; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.03.033
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The widening range of treatment options for epilepsy, and their potential outcomes, mean decisions about treatment for people with epilepsy (PWE) are often complex. While antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) represent the mainstay of treatment, other potential nondrug interventions are gaining in importance. These treatments all have the potential for harming those using them, as well as bringing benefits. This study examined the views and experiences of PWE about a range of treatment options. We used both qualitative and quantitative approaches - a series of depth-narrative interviews, followed by a large-scale survey. Treatment options and healthcare priorities deemed important by at least 10% of interview participants were then addressed as a series of statements in the follow-on survey questionnaire. Quantitative responses supported healthcare priorities identified through the qualitative interviews. The key goal of treatment among study participants was to be able to live 'a normal life'. Important physical, psychological, and life benefits of treatment were identified - most being the direct consequence of improved seizure control. One psychological benefit, reduced worry, was also identified as an important treatment goal. All participants viewed AEDs as appropriate first-line treatment; and since adverse effects of AEDs had implications for individual levels of daily function and wellbeing, their appropriate management was considered important. In contrast, surgery was almost always regarded as the treatment of last resort. Despite lack of research evidence supporting their use, participants were interested in complementary therapies as adjunctive treatment and a means of coping with having epilepsy, with yoga and meditation of particular interest. An important finding was the desire for targeted services to help with memory problems, as was the call to increase availability of psychological/counseling services. Our findings emphasize the importance of providing treatment responsive to the life context of individual patients. They highlight not only the level of demand for specific treatment options, but also the need for high-quality evidence to support future investment in their provision. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 191
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment adherence among adolescents with epilepsy: What really matters?
    Carbone, Loretta
    Zebrack, Bradley
    Plegue, Melissa
    Joshi, Sucheta
    Shellhaas, Renee
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 27 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [2] WHAT REALLY MATTERS TO PEOPLE WITH EPILEPSY? RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL PATIENT SURVEY
    Cramer, J. A.
    Dupont, S.
    Goodwin, M.
    Trinka, E.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2012, 53 : 87 - 87
  • [3] A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Antiretroviral Treatment Preferences: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Yelverton, Valerie
    Ostermann, Jan
    Hobbie, Amy
    Madut, Deng
    Thielman, Nathan
    [J]. AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2018, 32 (09) : 340 - 348
  • [4] WHAT REALLY MATTERS TO PEOPLE WITH EPILEPSY IN 2011? A PAN-EUROPEAN PATIENT SURVEY
    Cramer, J. A.
    Dupont, S.
    Goodwin, M.
    Trinka, E.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2011, 52 : 23 - 23
  • [5] 'What really annoys me is people take it like it's a disability', epilepsy, disability and identity among people of Pakistani origin living in the UK
    Rhodes, Penny J.
    Small, Neil A.
    Ismail, Hanif
    Wright, John P.
    [J]. ETHNICITY & HEALTH, 2008, 13 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [6] MEASURING WHAT MATTERS TO PEOPLE WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND PREFERENCES FOR NOVEL METHODS TO ASSESS CLINICAL OUTCOMES
    Adlard, N. E.
    Panpurina, A.
    Patel, V. J.
    Khurana, V
    Medin, J.
    Kubara, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S350 - S351
  • [7] "What matters to you" on the day of surgery: Protocol for a mixed methods study
    Gamst-Jensen, H.
    Villumsen, B. R.
    Nielsen, A. H.
    Egerod, I.
    Brix, L. D.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 68 (08) : 1101 - 1106
  • [8] Motivators, Barriers, and Preferences to Engagement With Offered Social Care Assistance Among People With Diabetes: A Mixed Methods Study
    Cohen, Alicia J.
    Isaacson, Nicole
    Torby, Michelle
    Smith, Alyssa
    Zhang, Guanghao
    Patel, Minal R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (03) : S152 - S163
  • [9] What is the role of community fridges in the UK? An exploratory mixed methods study
    Visram, S.
    Brown, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30 : V265 - V265
  • [10] Perceptions of treatment for tics among young people with Tourette syndrome and their parents: a mixed methods study
    José Cuenca
    Cris Glazebrook
    Tim Kendall
    Tammy Hedderly
    Isobel Heyman
    Georgina Jackson
    Tara Murphy
    Hugh Rickards
    Mary Robertson
    Jeremy Stern
    Penny Trayner
    Chris Hollis
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 15