Age and Sex Differences Between Patient and Physician-Derived Outcome Measures in the Foot and Ankle

被引:25
|
作者
Baumhauer, Judith F. [1 ]
McIntosh, Scott [1 ]
Rechtine, Glenn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
来源
关键词
TERM FOLLOW-UP; LONG-TERM; RHEUMATOID FOOT; FRACTURES; INDEX; OSTEOARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY; RELIABILITY; ARTHRITIS; HALLUX;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.K.01467
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditionally, physicians have identified which outcome factors are important to measure in order to determine the success or failure of treatment without any input from patients. The purpose of the present study was to ascertain the five outcome factors that are most important to the patient and the impact that age and sex have on these factors. These five most important patient-derived outcome factors were then compared with factors within two of the most commonly used outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. Methods: Informant interviews, pre-testing, consistency analysis, and pilot testing led to the construction of a twenty-item survey of outcome factors that patients identified as being important in the treatment of their foot or ankle problem. Subjects selected the top five factors and rank ordered them from 1 to 5 (with 1 representing extreme importance and 5 representing least importance). One thousand computer simulations identified the top five factors, and these were subsequently stratified for sex and age. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Benjamini-Hochberg tests were used to compare the data between groups. Results: The survey was completed by 783 subjects. The five most important factors were limited walking (p < 0.05), activity-related pain (p < 0.05), constant pain (p < 0.05), difficulty with prolonged standing (p = 0.754), and inability to do one's job or housework (p = 0.995). Shoe-related issues and foot and ankle weakness were significantly different between the sexes. Constant pain, inability to play sports, inability to participate in a job or housework, and recurrent foot or ankle skin sores or infections were significantly different between age groups. Between 38% and 50% of the outcome points found on two commonly used foot and ankle instruments included factors not of primary importance to the patient. Conclusions: There are sex and age-related differences regarding outcome factors following the treatment of disorders affecting the foot and ankle. As many as 50% of the factors in currently used foot and ankle outcome instruments are not of primary importance to patients.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relative responsiveness of physician-derived and patient-derived core set measures in trials of rheumatoid arthritis.
    Neogi, T.
    Xie, H.
    Felson, D. T.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (09): : S186 - S187
  • [2] Patient self report outcomes are as accurate measures for disease activity as physician-derived measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Yazici, Y.
    Pisoni, C.
    Tokuda, Y.
    Kishimoto, M.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 : 495 - 495
  • [3] The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery
    Parker, J
    Nester, CJ
    Long, AF
    Barrie, J
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 24 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [4] Are current foot-and ankle outcome measures appropriate for the evaluation of treatment for osteoarthritis of the ankle?: Evaluation of ceiling effects in foot-and ankle outcome measures
    Veltman, Ewout S.
    Hofstad, Cheriel J.
    Witteveen, Angelique G. H.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2017, 23 (03) : 168 - 172
  • [5] Machine Learning Applied to Patient-Reported Outcomes to Classify Physician-Derived Measures of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    Su, Yujie
    Black, Shawn
    Xu, Stephen
    Langholff, Wayne
    Bingham, Clifton O.
    Kafka, Shelly
    Xie, Fenglong
    ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 4 (12) : 995 - 1003
  • [6] The Popularity of Outcome Measures Used in the Foot and Ankle Literature
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Schneider, Andrew D.
    Pyper, Michael
    Laughlin, Richard T.
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2020, 13 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [7] Assessment of the structural validity of three foot and ankle specific patient-reported outcome measures
    Ponkilainen, Ville T.
    Tukiainen, Erkki J.
    Uimonen, Mikko M.
    Hakkinen, Arja H.
    Repo, Jussi P.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (02) : 169 - 174
  • [8] Evaluation of Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of 3 Patient-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Measures
    Venkatesan, Murali
    Aziz, Sheweidin
    Mahadevan, Dev
    Korim, Tawfiq
    Dias, Joe
    Bhatia, Maneesh
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 59 (03): : 507 - 512
  • [9] Overview of outcome measures for the assessment of prosthetic foot and ankle components
    Hafner, BJ
    Proceedings of the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists, 2006, : P105 - P112
  • [10] Testing the validity of surgical outcome measures for the foot and ankle.
    Samimi, D
    Vyas, R
    Soohoo, N
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (01) : S163 - S163