Multiple Criteria Evaluation of transportation performance for selected agribusiness companies

被引:17
|
作者
Baran, Joanna [1 ]
Zak, Jacek [2 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, PL-02787 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Tech, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
关键词
transportation; agribusiness company; multiple criteria decision making; METHODOLOGY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.065
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper presents the analysis of transportation activities carried out in different agribusiness entities and resulting in the overall ranking of transportation units operating in the considered agribusiness companies. It is assumed that all these units utilize their own fleet and thus arrange transportation services, by themselves, as the company's internal activities. The data for analysis is obtained from the survey research carried out on a sample of transportation units operating in 10 agribusiness companies. The authors define a consistent family of criteria that allows to evaluate transportation activity in an agribusiness industry, including both universal merits and industry specific transportation features. The evaluation matrix is constructed and the ranking of 10 transportation units is generated. It is based on a subjective model of preferences defined by the decision maker (DM) - the management teams of the analyzed agribusiness companies. The defined model of preferences includes the interests of different stakeholders, such as: customers, employees (in particular drivers) and the society. In the computational phase a multiple criteria ranking procedure called Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is applied. A series of computational experiments is carried out. As a result a company featured by the most desirable transportation performance is selected. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 329
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF TRANSPORTATION IN AGRIBUSINESS COMPANIES
    Gorecka, Aleksandra
    Rokicki, Tomasz
    [J]. CLC 2013: CARPATHIAN LOGISTICS CONGRESS - CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2014, : 24 - 30
  • [2] Multiple Criteria and Fuzzy Based Evaluation of Logistics Performance for Intermodal Transportation
    Hanaoka, Shinya
    Kunadhamraks, Pichet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2009, 43 (02) : 123 - 153
  • [3] Use of internal transfer pricing for performance evaluation by Brazilian agribusiness companies
    de Souza, Marcos Antonio
    Rodniski, Cleber Marcos
    Schnorr, Eduardo
    Rosa da Silva, Jorge Luiz
    [J]. CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2016, 12 (02): : 118 - 137
  • [4] Multiple Criteria Evaluation and Optimization of Transportation Systems
    Zak, Jacek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2009, 43 (02) : 91 - 94
  • [5] Multiple Criteria Evaluation and Optimization of Transportation Systems
    Zak, Jacek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2009, 43 (04) : 367 - 370
  • [6] Corporate responsibility: a performance analysis of agribusiness companies
    Osorio, Raquel Rodrigues
    de Oliveira, Leticia
    Leal de Souza, Angela Rozane
    [J]. CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2023, 19 (01): : 401 - 423
  • [7] Performance analysis of agribusiness companies: a study in Brazil
    Panosso, Oderson
    de Lima Moreno, Gleice Carvalho
    Hein, Adriana Kroenke
    Hein, Nelson
    [J]. CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2022, 18 (01): : 387 - 405
  • [8] Assessment of Selected Performance and Operational Criteria in Transport Companies in the Czech Republic
    Konecna, Natalie
    Lenert, David
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF BORDER AREAS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND POLAND: SUPPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (RASPO 2021), 2021, : 115 - 122
  • [9] THE EVALUATION OF AIR TRANSPORTATION NETWORK-BASED ON MULTIPLE CRITERIA
    CEHA, R
    OHTA, H
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 27 (1-4) : 249 - 252
  • [10] Evaluation of agribusiness performance in Nigeria
    Ume, Chukwuma Otum
    Enete, Anslem Anibueze
    Onyekuru, Anthony Nwajesus
    Opata, Patience Ifeyinwa
    [J]. AFRICA JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 6 (04) : 327 - 349