Ecocytogenetics as a biomonitoring model for occupational exposure

被引:0
|
作者
Fucic, Aleksandra [1 ]
Znaor, Ariana [2 ]
Jazbec, Ana Marija [3 ]
Sedlar, Mijenko [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Med Res & Occupat Hlth, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Nat Inst Publ Hlth, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Fac Forestry, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
chromosome aberration assay; sister chromatid exchange frequency; micronucleus assay; occupational exposure; ionizing radiation; ultrasound; policy; cancer;
D O I
10.1007/1-4020-4845-9_6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Biomonitoring has become a potent tool for preventive medical care and occupational health policy. Recent epidemiological results confirm the utility of chromosome aberrations as a biomarker for cancer risk. The present study included 1,200 subjects exposed to physical and chemical agents. As human health genotoxicity studies are time consuming and expensive, it is necessary to select populations with the highest health risk to be studied for biomonitoring. Our results suggest genotoxicological analyses should be performed for subjects exposed to the chemicals listed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as Group I carcinogens, radioisotopes, individuals that have been simultaneously exposed to ionizing radiation and ultrasound, and a subgroup of nuclear plant workers. The input of a new genotoxicological monitoring model, termed "cocytogeneties", is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BIOMONITORING OF OCCUPATIONAL TOLUENE EXPOSURE
    APOSTOLI, P
    BRUGNONE, F
    PERBELLINI, L
    COCHEO, V
    BELLOMO, ML
    SILVESTRI, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1982, 50 (02) : 153 - 168
  • [2] Biomonitoring of occupational exposure in occupational health: Regulations
    Fontana, L.
    [J]. ARCHIVES DES MALADIES PROFESSIONNELLES ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT, 2012, 73 (03) : 443 - 446
  • [3] Biomonitoring of occupational and environmental exposure to pesticides
    Goen, T.
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR ARBEITSMEDIZIN ARBEITSSCHUTZ UND ERGONOMIE, 2016, 66 (05): : 276 - 285
  • [4] Human biomonitoring of occupational exposure to formaldehyde
    Costa, S.
    Coelho, P.
    Costa, C.
    Silva, S.
    Coelho, M.
    Porto, B.
    Teixeira, J. P.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 205 : S73 - S73
  • [5] New aspects in the biomonitoring of occupational exposure to styrene
    Vodicka, P
    Stetina, R
    Koskinen, M
    Soucek, P
    Vodicková, L
    Hlavác, P
    Kuricová, M
    Necasová, R
    Hemminki, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2002, 75 (Suppl 1) : S75 - S85
  • [6] Biomonitoring for Occupational Exposure to Diisocyanates: A Systematic Review
    Scholten, Bernice
    Kenny, Laura
    Duca, Radu-Corneliu
    Pronk, Anjoeka
    Santonen, Tiina
    Galea, Karen S.
    Loh, Miranda
    Huumonen, Katriina
    Sleeuwenhoek, Anne
    Creta, Matteo
    Godderis, Lode
    Jones, Kate
    [J]. ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH, 2020, 64 (06) : 569 - 585
  • [7] Biomonitoring of occupational exposure: From principles to practices
    Nisse, C.
    [J]. ARCHIVES DES MALADIES PROFESSIONNELLES ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT, 2012, 73 (03) : 447 - 450
  • [8] Biomonitoring of occupational exposure to phthalates: A systematic review
    Frery, Nadine
    Santonen, Tiina
    Porras, Simo P.
    Fucic, Aleksandra
    Leso, Veruscka
    Bousoumah, Radia
    Duca, Radu Corneliu
    El Yamani, Mounia
    Kolossa-Gehring, Marike
    Ndaw, Sophie
    Viegas, Susana
    Iavicoli, Ivo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2020, 229
  • [9] New aspects in the biomonitoring of occupational exposure to styrene
    Pavel Vodicka
    Rudolf Stetina
    Mikko Koskinen
    Pavel Soucek
    Ludmila Vodicková
    Pavel Hlavác
    Miroslava Kuricová
    Radka Necasová
    Kari Hemminki
    [J]. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2002, 75 : 75 - 85
  • [10] Occupational exposure to aluminum and its biomonitoring in perspective
    Riihimaki, Vesa
    Aitio, Antero
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 42 (10) : 827 - 853