Contemporary 2-Stage Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Infection with Evidence-Based Standardized Protocols Yields Excellent Results: Caveats and Recommendations

被引:9
|
作者
Wichern, Emily M. [1 ]
Zielinski, Matthew R. [2 ]
Ziemba-Davis, Mary [3 ]
Meneghini, R. Michael [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, MD Educ Program, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] IU Hlth Hip & Knee Ctr, IU Hlth Phys Orthoped & Sports Med, Fishers, IN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 10期
关键词
periprosthetic joint infection; 2-stage treatment; 1-stage treatment; total hip arthroplasty; hip infection; hip revision; JOINT INFECTION; POOR OUTCOMES; ONE-STAGE; RESECTION ARTHROPLASTY; ANTIBIOTIC CEMENT; REVISION; EXCHANGE; RECONSTRUCTION; REPLACEMENTS; GENTAMICIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.028
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study quantified the effectiveness of contemporary and evidence-based standardized 2-stage treatment for periprosthetic hip infection. Findings illustrate potential limitations of criticisms of 2-stage protocols and potential consequences of adopting single-stage protocols before definitive data are available. Methods: Fifty-four consecutive hips treated with 2-stage resection and reimplantation were retrospectively reviewed. Standardized protocols were adhered to including implant resection, meticulous surgical debridement, antibiotic spacer, 6-week intravenous antibiotics, a 2-week drug holiday, and laboratory assessment of infection eradication before reimplantation. After reimplantation, patients were placed on prophylactic intravenous antibiotics until discharge and discharged on oral antibiotics for a minimum of 7 days until intraoperative cultures were final. Successful treatment was defined per Delphi-based International Multidisciplinary Consensus. Results: The overall treatment success rate was 95.7% (44 of 46 cases) with mean infection-free survivorship of 67.2 (range, 23.8-106.4) months. Success rates were 100% for early and acute hematogenous infections regardless of host type and 100% for chronic infections in uncompromised hosts. 95% (19/20) of chronic infections in compromised hosts and 83.3% (5/6) of chronic infections in significantly compromised hosts were successfully treated. About 4% of primary hips and 20% of revision hips required repeat debridement and spacer exchange after initial resection. No patients died because of treatment. Conclusion: Details from this consecutive series of patients undergoing 2-stage treatment for hip infection suggest that some criticisms of 2-stage treatment as well as some arguments in support of single-stage treatment may be overstated. Promotion and uncritical adoption of single-stage treatment protocols are discouraged until further and more definitive data exist. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2983 / 2995
页数:13
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Infection Caused by Resistant Microorganisms Using 2-Stage Reimplantation Protocol
    Lim, Seung-Jae
    Park, Jae-Chul
    Moon, Young-Wan
    Park, Youn-Soo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (08): : 1264 - 1269
  • [2] Complications with cement spacers in 2-stage treatment of periprosthetic joint infection on total hip replacement
    Erivan, R.
    Lecointe, T.
    Villatte, G.
    Mulliez, A.
    Descamps, S.
    Boisgard, S.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (03) : 333 - 339
  • [3] Long-Term Results of a 2-Stage Exchange Protocol for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in 164 Hips
    Petis, Stephen M.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    Mabry, Tad M.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (01): : 74 - 84