Science-based management of livestock welfare in intensive systems: looking to the future

被引:3
|
作者
Vannier, P.
Michel, V. [1 ,2 ]
Keeling, L. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Avian & Rabbit Welf & Epidemiol EBEAC, French Agcy Food Environm & Occupat Hlth & Safety, Ploufragan, France
[2] Univ Europeenne Bretagne, Bretagne, France
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Environm & Hlth, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Inspection; Multidimensional concept; Multidisciplinary approach; Production system; Welfare assessment; Welfare indicator; ANIMAL-BASED MEASURES; LITTER PROVISION; FURNISHED CAGES; MORTALITY; LININGS; WEIGHT; FLOCKS;
D O I
10.20506/rst.33.1.2255
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
As welfare is a multidimensional concept, its assessment should be a multidisciplinary process, providing a comprehensive assessment of animal welfare in any given system. The different measurable aspects of welfare may be turned into welfare indicators and assessed in a scientific manner. Assessment of welfare may combine different approaches that include the assessment of the production system and measurement of animal-based welfare indicators. With both approaches, however, risk managers face difficulties related to the availability of resources for implementing regulations and training staff. Most animal-based welfare indicators have the advantage that they can be measured whatever the production system; they relate to the animal's experience of its own state. It is essential to confirm the reliability of the measures and their robustness to ensure valid welfare assessment, especially for a science-based management approach. Many welfare indicators, even those measured at the individual level, are expressed at group level, as a proportion of the animals. This allows benchmarking and following of trends over time. The decision on what is or is not acceptable from a welfare point of view is an ethical or managerial one. The advantage of a graded welfare indicator is that it allows different thresholds to be set by different people, countries or organisations, depending on the purpose of the assessment. The development of a set of harmonised international welfare indicators for global trade is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 160
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems
    Berckmans, D.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2014, 33 (01): : 189 - 196
  • [2] Science-based assessment of welfare:: aquatic animals
    Håstein, T
    Scarfe, AD
    Lund, VL
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (02): : 529 - 547
  • [3] The systems approach framework for collaborative, science-based management of complex systems
    Josianne G. Støttrup
    Grete E. Dinesen
    Johanna Schumacher
    Christina Gillgren
    Miguel Inácio
    Gerald Schernewski
    [J]. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2019, 23 : 881 - 898
  • [4] The systems approach framework for collaborative, science-based management of complex systems
    Stottrup, Josianne G.
    Dinesen, Grete E.
    Schumacher, Johanna
    Gillgren, Christina
    Inacio, Miguel
    Schernewski, Gerald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 23 (05) : 881 - 898
  • [5] Looking Forward: Science-Based Policy-Making
    Town, William
    [J]. SCIENCE AND THE LAW: ANALYTICAL DATA IN SUPPORT OF REGULATION IN HEALTH, FOOD, AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 1147 : 1 - 11
  • [6] Science-based assessment of animal welfare: companion animals
    Odendaal, JSJ
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (02): : 493 - 502
  • [7] Science-based assessment of animal welfare: laboratory animals
    Baumans, V
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (02): : 503 - 513
  • [8] Science-based assessment of animal welfare: farm animals
    Duncan, IJH
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (02): : 483 - 492
  • [9] Welfare group to push for science-based policy, practices
    不详
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 235 (02): : 139 - 139
  • [10] Forest management: Science-based and understandable
    von Gadow, K
    Kleinn, C
    [J]. BALANCING ECOSYSTEM VALUES: INNOVATIVE EXPERIMENTS FOR SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2004, 635 : 15 - 24