Is It Useful to Question the Recovery Behaviour of Patients with ME/CFS or Long COVID?

被引:14
|
作者
Vink, Mark
Vink-Niese, Friso
机构
[1] Independent Researcher, Amsterdam
[2] Independent Researcher, Osnabrück
关键词
CFS; chronic fatigue syndrome; eminence-based medicine; evidence-based medicine; insurance medicine; long COVID; ME; occupational medicine; post-infectious disease; recovery behaviour; CHRONIC-FATIGUE-SYNDROME; MODERATE EXERCISE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare10020392
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
For the last few decades, medical guidelines have recommended treating patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) with graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Moreover, doctors have questioned the recovery behaviour of these patients and stimulated them to follow these treatments so that they would be able to go back to work. In this article, we reviewed trials of GET and CBT for ME/CFS that reported on work status before and after treatment to answer the question of whether doctors should continue to question the recovery behaviour of patients with ME/CFS. Our review shows that more patients are unable to work after treatment than before treatment with CBT and GET. It also highlights the fact that both treatments are unsafe for patients with ME/CFS. Therefore, questioning the recovery behaviour of patients with ME/CFS is pointless. This confirms the conclusion from the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), which has recently published its updated ME/CFS guideline and concluded that CBT and GET are not effective and do not lead to recovery. Studies on CBT and GET for long COVID have not yet been published. However, this review offers no support for their use in improving the recovery of patients with an ME/CFS-like illness after infection with COVID-19, nor does it lend any support to the practice of questioning the recovery behaviour of these patients.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treating ME/CFS and Long Covid
    Langford, Katherine
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIST, 2024, 37
  • [2] There is an overlap between long covid and ME/CFS
    Gilbert, Alexis
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 383
  • [3] ME/CFS and Post-Exertional Malaise among Patients with Long COVID
    Jason, Leonard A.
    Dorri, Joseph A.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 15 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [4] We need better care for long covid and ME/CFS
    Gilbert, Alexis
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 383
  • [5] Long COVID: don't consign ME/CFS to history
    White, Peter
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 587 (7833) : 197 - 197
  • [6] Long COVID: don’t consign ME/CFS to history
    Peter White
    [J]. Nature, 2020, 587 : 197 - 197
  • [7] Assistive Robots for Long COVID and ME/CFS Support: Challenges and Opportunities
    Redfield, Signe
    Seto, Mae
    D'Amore, Nicholas
    [J]. 2022 IEEE CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (CCECE), 2022, : 124 - 129
  • [8] Clinical Characteristics of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Diagnosed in Patients with Long COVID
    Tokumasu, Kazuki
    Honda, Hiroyuki
    Sunada, Naruhiko
    Sakurada, Yasue
    Matsuda, Yui
    Yamamoto, Koichiro
    Nakano, Yasuhiro
    Hasegawa, Toru
    Yamamoto, Yukichika
    Otsuka, Yuki
    Hagiya, Hideharu
    Kataoka, Hitomi
    Ueda, Keigo
    Otsuka, Fumio
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (07):
  • [9] ME/CFS: Researchers question credibility of NICE guidance
    Mahase, Elisabeth
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 382 : p1621
  • [10] The importance of estimating prevalence of ME/CFS in future epidemiological studies of long COVID
    Grabowska, Anna D.
    Westermeier, Francisco
    Nacul, Luis
    Lacerda, Eliana
    Sepulveda, Nuno
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11