共 50 条
Improved survival with combined gemcitabine and S-1 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: pooled analysis of three randomized studies
被引:26
|作者:
Yanagimoto, Hiroaki
[1
]
Ishii, Hiroshi
[2
]
Nakai, Yousuke
[3
]
Ozaka, Masato
[2
]
Ikari, Takaaki
[2
]
Koike, Kazuhiko
[3
]
Ueno, Hideki
[4
]
Ioka, Tatsuya
[5
]
Satoi, Sohei
[1
]
Sho, Masayuki
[6
]
Okusaka, Takuji
[4
]
Tanaka, Masao
[7
]
Shimokawa, Toshio
[8
]
Kwon, A-Hon
[1
]
Isayama, Hiroyuki
[3
]
机构:
[1] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Surg, Hirakata, Osaka 5731010, Japan
[2] Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo, Dept Gastroenterol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Oncol Div, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Screening Canc Digest Organs, Osaka, Japan
[6] Nara Med Univ, Dept Surg, Kashihara, Nara 634, Japan
[7] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Oncol, Fukuoka 812, Japan
[8] Univ Yamanashi, Grad Sch Med & Engn, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan
关键词:
Gemcitabine with S-1;
Locally advanced pancreatic cancer;
Pooled analysis;
PHASE-III TRIAL;
ORAL S-1;
THERAPY;
CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
5-FLUOROURACIL;
CHEMOTHERAPY;
FOLFIRINOX;
CARCINOMA;
RADIATION;
D O I:
10.1002/jhbp.130
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background The long-term prognosis for localized pancreatic cancer (PC) remains poor. Three randomized trials (GEST phase III, JACCRO PC-01 phase II and GEMSAP phase II) evaluated gemcitabine (Gem) with or without S-1 for patients with metastatic and locally advanced PC. A pooled analysis based on published data examined whether Gem with S-1 (GS) is superior to Gem alone in overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced PC. Methods Data were extracted on 193 patients: 31 (JACCRO), 28 (GEMSAP), and 134 (GEST). OS was used for primary endpoint and progression-free survival (PFS) was used for secondary endpoint. A general variance-based method was used to estimate the pooled HR and 95% CI between GS (n = 96) and Gem (n = 97). Results Meta-analysis demonstrated that the overall risk of death was significantly different between the two chemotherapies (hazard ratio = 0.673, 95% confidence interval: 0.488-0.929, P = 0.016). The median PFSs for GS and GEM in the JACCRO, GEMSAP, and GEST studies were 12.0, 12.6, and 10.7 months, and 4.1, 8.1, and 6.2 months, respectively (P = 0.001). The random-effect pooled estimate for 165 patients showed the objective response rate (ORR) in the GS group (28.4%) was better in the Gem group (8.3%, P = 0.001). Conclusions GS improved ORR, PFS and OS in patients with locally advanced PC over Gem alone. GS could become one of the front-line chemotherapeutic agents.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 766
页数:6
相关论文