Walk score® and its potential contribution to the study of active transport and walkability: A critical and systematic review

被引:126
|
作者
Hall, C. Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ram, Yael [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Management Mkt & Entrepreneurship, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Oulu, Dept Geog, Oulu, Finland
[3] Linnaeus Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Kalmar, Sweden
[4] Univ Johannesburg, Sch Tourism & Hospitality, Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] Ashkelon Acad Coll, Dept Tourism Studies, Ashqelon, Israel
关键词
Active transport; Built environment; Leisure walking; Utilitarian walking; Walk Score (R); Walkability; BODY-MASS INDEX; ESTIMATING NEIGHBORHOOD WALKABILITY; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; UTILITARIAN WALKING; ASSOCIATIONS; ADULTS; OBESITY; VALIDATION; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Walk Score (R) index has become increasingly applied in studies of walking and walkability. The index assesses the "walking potential" of a place through a combination of three elements: the shortest distance to a group of preselected destinations, the block length, and the intersection density around the origin. The Index links a gravity-based measure (distance accessibility), with topological accessibility (street connectivity) measured by two complementary indicators that act as penalties in the final score (R) (linearly expanded in the range 0-100). A systematic review of Scopus (R) and Web of Science was conducted with 42 journal articles eventually being evaluated. Research was primarily undertaken in North American urban geographies. Analysis of walk ability using Walk Score (R) is inconsistent. Twenty-nine papers do not exclusively relying on Walk Score (R) as a single measurement of walkability and add further estimates to better capture the multiple dimensions of walkability. In 33 studies the Walk Score (R) was used as an independent variable, and only once as a mediating-moderating variable. In eight papers (18%) the Walk Score (R) was a part of a bivariate correlation model. On no occasion was it used as a dependent variable. Results tend to only partly support the validity of Walk Score (R). The paper concludes that the Index is best understood as a surrogate measure of the density of the built environment of a specific neighborhood that indicates utilitarian walking potential. Implications for, and potential areas of, future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 324
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contributions and Limitations Walk Score® in the Context of Walkability: A Scoping Review
    Brown, Jennifer Ann
    Curtin, Kimberley D.
    Thomson, Mathew
    Kung, Janice Y.
    Nykiforuk, Candace I. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2023, 55 (6-7) : 468 - 519
  • [2] Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review
    Grasser, Gerlinde
    Van Dyck, Delfien
    Titze, Sylvia
    Stronegger, Willibald
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 58 (04) : 615 - 625
  • [3] A Study on the Walkability of Zijingang East Campus of Zhejiang University: Based on Network Distance Walk Score
    Mu, Te
    Lao, Yanqing
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [4] From walkability to active living potential -: An "ecometric" validation study
    Gauvin, L
    Richard, L
    Craig, CL
    Spivock, M
    Riva, M
    Forster, M
    Laforest, S
    Laberge, S
    Fournel, MC
    Gagnon, H
    Gagné, S
    Potvin, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 28 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [5] Quantum walk and its application domains: A systematic review
    Kadian, Karuna
    Garhwal, Sunita
    Kumar, Ajay
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 41
  • [6] CONTRIBUTION TO STUDY OF ACTIVE TRANSPORT ACROSS EPITHELIA
    BURGOS, MH
    [J]. ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA LATINOAMERICANA, 1961, 11 : 280 - +
  • [7] Systematic review of interventions for promoting active school transport
    Villa-Gonzalez, Emilio
    Barranco-Ruiz, Yaira
    Evenson, Kelly R.
    Chillon, Palma
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 111 : 115 - 134
  • [8] Parental barriers to active transport to school: a systematic review
    Aranda-Balboa, M. J.
    Huertas-Delgado, F. J.
    Herrador-Colmenero, M.
    Cardon, G.
    Chillon, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 65 (01) : 87 - 98
  • [9] The current significance of the FOUR score: A systematic review and critical analysis of the literature
    Anestis, Dimitrios M.
    Tsitsopoulos, Parmenion P.
    Tsonidis, Christos A.
    Foroglou, Nikolaos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 409
  • [10] Propensity score matching in otolaryngologic literature: A systematic review and critical appraisal
    Prasad, Aman
    Shin, Max
    Carey, Ryan M.
    Chorath, Kevin
    Parhar, Harman
    Appel, Scott
    Moreira, Alvaro
    Rajasekaran, Karthik
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):