Tacrolimus or cyclosporine:: Which is the better partner for mycophenolate-mofetil in heart transplant recipients?

被引:57
|
作者
Meiser, BM
Groetzner, J
Kaczmarek, I
Landwehr, P
Müller, M
Jung, S
Überfuhr, P
Fraunberger, P
Stempfle, HU
Weis, M
Reichart, B
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Cardiac Surg, Grosshadern Med Ctr, D-81366 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Clin Chem, Grosshadern Med Ctr, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 1, Grosshadern Med Ctr, Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med, Grosshadern Med Ctr, Munich, Germany
关键词
tacrolimus; cyclosporine; mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolic acid trough level; acute rejection; cardiac allograft vasculopathy;
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000129814.52456.25
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The aim of this single-center study was to investigate whether trough level adjusted mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is more efficacious in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine (CsA) and to evaluate the impact of either drug on MMF dosage. Methods. Sixty patients (TAC, n = 30; CsA, n = 30) undergoing heart transplantation were randomized into a prospective, open-label, controlled trial. Immunosuppression consisted of TAC or CsA in combination with MMF and corticosteroids. Target blood trough levels of TAC, CsA, and mycophenolic acid (MPA) were in the range of 10 to 15 ng/mL, 100 to 300 ng/mL, and 1.5 to 4.0 mug/mL, respectively. Acute rejection episodes (ARE); survival data; and adverse events with a special emphasis on infections, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and the development of graft vessel disease (GVD) were recorded. Results. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. All patients were successfully withdrawn from corticosteroids within 6 months of transplant. Freedom from acute rejection was significantly higher (P = 0.0001) and the incidence of ARE per 100 patient days significantly lower in the TAC-MMF group than in the CsA-MMF group (0.03 vs. 0.15; P = 0.00007). Overall patient survival during follow-up was similar (93% vs. 90%). To achieve the targeted MPA blood levels, a significantly lower dose of MMF was required for TAC versus CsA patients. After a follow-up time of 2 years, the mean GVD score was 1.85 +/- 3.18 in the TAC-MMF group and 3.95 +/- 4.8 in the CsA-MMF group (P = 0.08). Conclusions. At the selected doses and target levels for TAC and CsA used in this study, trough level adjusted MMF was more efficacious in combination with TAC for prevention of ARE. Furthermore, CsA patients need significantly more MMF to achieve similar MPA levels.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 598
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetiel (MMF): Which is the better partner for tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients?
    Groetzner, J.
    Wittwer, T.
    Strauch, J.
    Madershahian, N.
    Nagib, R.
    Franke, U.
    Wahlers, Th.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (02): : S167 - S167
  • [2] Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine and azathioprine in heart transplant recipients
    Teebken, OE
    Strüber, M
    Harringer, W
    Pichlmaier, MA
    Haverich, A
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (04) : 1265 - 1268
  • [3] Clinical outcome of heart transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus with or without mycophenolate mofetil
    Fuchs, U
    Tenderich, G
    Zittermann, A
    Szabados, F
    Minami, K
    Koerfer, R
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 20 (04) : 450 - 456
  • [4] Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplant recipients
    Forsythe, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (7A) : 69S - 71S
  • [5] TACROLIMUS OR CYCLOSPORINE: WHICH IS THE BETTER MAINTENANCE IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS?
    Seungyeup, Han
    Yaerim, Kim
    Sungbae, Park
    Hyungtae, Kim
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 19 : 113 - 113
  • [6] Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function
    Liu, B
    Lin, ZB
    Ming, CS
    Zhang, WJ
    Chen, ZS
    Sha, B
    Zeng, FJ
    Chen, S
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (01) : 87 - 88
  • [7] Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolate Mofetil in heart transplant recipients
    Seebacher, G
    Mallinger, R
    Laufer, G
    Grimm, M
    Griesmacher, A
    Weigel, G
    Wolner, E
    Müller, MM
    [J]. PURINE AND PYRIMIDINE METABOLISM IN MAN IX, 1998, 431 : 801 - 803
  • [8] BUDGET IMPACT OF THE TACROLIMUS-MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL REGIMEN ON HEART TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS IN COLOMBIA
    Lasalvia, P.
    Hernandez, F.
    Montoya, G.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S71 - S71
  • [9] Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine
    Lobritto, Steven J.
    Rosenthal, Philip
    Bouw, Rene
    Leung, Mimi
    Snell, Paul
    Mamelok, Richard D.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 13 (11) : 1570 - 1575
  • [10] Elective withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and prednisone
    ter Meulen, CG
    Gregoor, PJHS
    Weimar, W
    Hilbrands, LB
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 14 (02) : 99 - 102